đ Inside Michael Jordanâs Silent War With Todayâs NBA Stars
.
.
.

Michael Jordan has been retired for over two decades, but the competitive fire that defined his career hasnât gone anywhere. On the surface, heâs the revered global icon, the standard against whom all others are measured. Beneath that, fans and analysts see something more complex: a legend quietly guarding his throne while a new generation questions, challenges, and sometimes outright provokes his legacy.
From LeBron James chasing every one of his records, to Kevin Durant questioning his stamina, to Joel Embiid flatly denying his GOAT status, the tension between Jordan and active stars reveals a deeper clash of eras, values, and definitions of greatness.
Below is a look at how Michael Jordanâs name collides with todayâs biggest playersâwhere the respect is real, where the friction is obvious, and where the âhateâ might be more fan fiction than fact.
đ LeBron James: Rival in Absentia
Michael Jordan has never publicly said he hates LeBron James. He rarely even talks about him in depth. But for years, the distance between them has spoken louder than any quote.
The dynamic began in the early 2000s, when a teenage LeBron was hailed as âthe next Jordanâ before playing an NBA game. That narrative unfolded while Jordan was on his Wizards comeback and, according to reports, it didnât sit well.
Their relationship has remained distant, professional at best. ESPNâs Brian Windhorst has noted they are not close, and their personalities point in opposite directions:
Jordan:Â obsessed with being feared, ruthless, confrontational, weaponizing every slight.
LeBron:Â collaborative, openly social, building superteams and friendships, seeking global acceptance.
The GOAT debate has turned this contrast into a cold rivalry. As LeBron climbed past Kareem Abdul-Jabbar to become the NBAâs all-time leading scorer and continued stacking records, every milestone invited comparisons to Jordanâs previously untouchable status.
Jordan addressed those comparisons in Paris by downplaying direct debates and emphasizing era differencesâhis tone respectful, but measured. In 2025, LeBron admitted that Jordan âdoesnât want to talk to me until Iâm done,â suggesting Jordan keeps his distance while LeBron is still actively chasing history in the iconic No. 23.
Social media has amplified the storyline: Jordan is seen as warmer toward Kobe Bryant and Stephen Curryâplayers whose legacies donât directly threaten his GOAT statusâwhile keeping LeBron at armâs length. Whether thatâs legacy protection or pure competitiveness, it underscores one philosophical divide:
Jordanâs greatness was built on being universally feared.
LeBronâs is built on being universally loved.
đŻ Kevin Durant: The Superteam Snub and the Baseball Jab
Kevin Durant has always praised Michael Jordan, insisting heâd dominate any era and calling him the GOAT. But admiration hasnât stopped tension from creeping into the narrative.
In 2017, Jordan defended Durantâs decision to join the 73-win Golden State Warriors, stating Durant had the right to go wherever he wanted. Yet he added he personally wouldnât have made the same choice. To Jordan, who stayed with Chicago through years of heartbreak before winning titles, joining a ready-made juggernaut likely falls short of the mental toughness he values.
The most direct friction came in 2025 on LeBron Jamesâ podcast. Durant, talking about commitment and âgoing 22 straight,â made a barely-veiled reference to Jordanâs 1993 retirement to play baseball:
âSome people say, âI want to go play baseball⊠and then I want to come back.â
Well, some people say, Iâm going to go 22 straight.â
Given that Jordan stepped away after his fatherâs murder, many saw this as disrespectful. Durant later clarified that Jordan is still the GOAT but doubled down that âMJ retired three timesâ and that itâs fair to point that out.
For a man who once invited his high school coach to his Hall of Fame speech just to publicly call him out, and who never forgave Isaiah Thomas for old playoff wars, Jordan is not famous for letting things go. Durantâs career choicesâjoining Golden State, then leaving, then searching for ideal situationsârepresent a modern brand of âring chasingâ that clashes with Jordanâs old-school grind-and-conquer ethos.
To Jordan, greatness is built with your team, not by jumping to the one that already broke the league.
đŠ Stephen Curry: Respect, Revolution, and a Generational Divide
Stephen Curry may be the modern star Jordan respects most, but their relationship still reveals the gap between eras.
Jordan has repeatedly praised Curry, once texting ESPNâs Stephen A. Smith at 5:54 a.m. to call him âby far the best shooter of all time.â He has offered him advice on handling defeat and appears more mentor than rival.
Two moments, however, sparked debate:
2019 Pickup Comment
- Asked to name his all-time pickup team, Jordan chose Hakeem Olajuwon, Magic Johnson, Scottie Pippen, and James Worthy, adding that Curry was âa great player, not a Hall of Famer yet.â
- Context matters: Curry was still active and ineligible for Hall of Fame consideration. Jordan was being technical; the internet turned it into disrespect.
2023 Point Guard Debate
- When Curry said he believed he was the greatest point guard of all time, Jordan again texted Stephen A. Smithâanother 5:54 a.m. messageâto disagree, insisting Magic Johnson still holds that crown. He called Curry revolutionary, the greatest shooter ever, and âvery closeâ to Magic, but placed him second.
Jordanâs reasoning reflects his lens: Magicâs five titles, triple-double dominance, and traditional point guard duties still define the position in his mind.
Underneath that is a deeper basketball split. Jordan played in a league built on mid-range mastery and physicality; he shot 32.7% from three, rarely taking more than two per game. Curry, at around 42.6% from deep, rewired the sport. Kids now grow up copying 30-foot step-backs instead of footwork and post-ups.
Jordan may admire Curryâs genius while quietly viewing the modern three-happy game as a dilution of âreal basketball.â Yet in this case, the supposed âhateâ is mostly an internet invention. The evidence we have shows genuine respect on both sides.

â James Harden: Fouls, Stats, and a Different Definition of Greatness
On paper, Michael Jordan has had kind words for James Harden, especially during Hardenâs peak in Houston, when he compared Hardenâs scoring explosions to his own.
Beneath the compliments, though, their games sit at opposite ends of the stylistic spectrum.
Hardenâs style:Â isolation-heavy, step-back threes, foul baiting, deliberately seeking contact.
Jordanâs era:Â brutal defense, hand-checking, fewer whistles, where players were expected to absorb hits, not hunt them.
The divide widened in 2019 when then-Rockets GM Daryl Morey argued it was âfactualâ that Harden was a better scorer than Jordan based on points per possession. Many saw that as sacrilege. Jordan, whose identity is intertwined with scoring titles and a perfect 6â0 Finals record, would have every reason to take that personally.
Hardenâs lack of a championship, multiple trade requests, and reputation for playoff disappointments form a modern archetype Jordan probably despises: a superstar whose individual brilliance never fully translates to ultimate winning. Even if Jordan respects Hardenâs talent, the philosophies they represent could not be more different.
đ Joel Embiid: Trash Talk and a GOAT Rejection
There is no record of a direct feud between Joel Embiid and Michael Jordanâbut Embiid has said things that would, in classic Jordan fashion, go straight onto the mental bulletin board.
Embiid is a relentless trash talker, a showman who taunts rivals and celebrates loudly. Heâs also a master troll online, turning social media into a second arena. Jordan played in an era without Twitter, but he loathed any semblance of gloating. Given how he held onto grudges against players like Isaiah Thomas, Embiidâs antics would likely provoke him.
The clearest flashpoint is a 2019 interview with The Ringer, where Embiid dismissed Jordan as the GOAT and chose Wilt Chamberlain instead:
âHeâs not the GOAT. To me, you got Wilt Chamberlain. Heâs got all the records and no one is ever going to beat them.â
Dennis Rodman responded by telling Embiid to âshut the f*** up,â underscoring how sacred Jordanâs status remains for his peers.
For a man whose legacy partly relies on near-universal recognition as the greatest ever, a dominant modern MVP flatly denying that status would not go unnoticed.
đ§ Chris Paul: Business, Power, and the Veto That Changed Everything
Chris Paul is a longtime Jordan Brand athlete, signed since 2006âon paper, a sign of deep respect from Jordan. Yet their paths intersect in ways that hint at underlying tension.
The most famous flashpoint is the vetoed 2011 trade that would have sent Paul to the Los Angeles Lakers to join Kobe Bryant. As owner of the then-Charlotte Bobcats, Jordan was among the small-market owners who pushed commissioner David Stern to block the deal, publicly arguing for the importance of competitive balance and keeping stars in smaller markets.
Critics have long suspected that there was more at play: Jordan, fiercely protective of his legacy and wary of mega-teams that could rewrite history, may not have wanted to see another supercharged Lakers dynasty rise.
A second, more light-hearted moment turned into viral legend in 2016 at Jordanâs basketball camp, when Paul bet that if Jordan missed three shots, the kids would get free Jordans. Jordan hit everything. A fake quoteââF*** them kidsââcirculated afterward, so believable that it cemented the image of Jordan as a ruthless competitor who wonât bend, not even for children or friends.
Add to this Paulâs role as a vocal union leader and advocate for player empowerment, and he stands in philosophical contrast with Jordanâs more owner-aligned, old-school perspective. Still, visible evidence of genuine personal animosity is scarce. This is a relationship defined more by subtext than open conflict.
đ„ Trae Young: The âSixth Manâ GOAT and a Snub in Greece
Trae Young has never gone to war with Michael Jordan, but his decisions and style fit perfectly into the kind of behavior that would irritate the ultra-prideful legend.
The first public eyebrow-raiser came when Young named his all-time starting five and placed Jordan as his sixth man, choosing Kobe Bryant and Kevin Durant on the wings instead. His explanationâthat he couldnât move Durant from the small forward spot because KD was one of his idolsâput personal bias ahead of historical consensus.
To most, it was a youthful, personal list. To a competitor like Jordan, being benched by a current player and Jordan Brand athlete could feel like a slap in the face.
In 2025, Young reportedly declined an invitation to a high-profile Jordan Brand event in Greece to attend Summer League with his Hawks teammates. From Jordanâs perspectiveârooted in hierarchy and deference to legendsâturning down a personal invitation for a less glamorous obligation could be interpreted as disrespectful.
On the court, Youngâs deep threes, foul hunting, and nutmegs embody a modern flair that older generations sometimes view as showboating. He has embraced the villain roleâsilencing Madison Square Garden, shushing crowdsâbut without the ring rĂ©sumĂ© that usually accompanies that level of bravado. That combination of swagger and limited playoff success is exactly the sort of thing Jordan tended to punish ruthlessly.
đŠ Giannis Antetokounmpo: The Rare Modern Star Jordan Truly Embraces
If most of Jordanâs interactions with modern stars are marked by distance or tension, Giannis Antetokounmpo is the notable exception.
Jordan has gone out of his way to praise the Bucks superstar. According to reports, he once called Stephen A. Smith at age 59 specifically to argue that Giannis deserved MVP over Nikola JokiÄ and Joel Embiid, allegedly cursing at Smith for disagreeing. That kind of unsolicited advocacy is almost unheard of from Jordan.
Their brief in-person interaction at the NBAâs 75th anniversary celebration left a big impression on Giannis, who described Jordan hugging him and telling him that the way he plays hard is âinspiring.â Giannis has repeatedly spoken of Jordan with reverence, and even joked that people shouldnât âbark atâ Jordan because he might âchoke someoneâ for being disrespectfulâa joke that simultaneously acknowledges Jordanâs intimidating aura and his thin-skinned competitiveness.
Giannis checks the boxes Jordan cares about: relentless motor, physical dominance, devotion to improvement, and emotional investment in winning. If thereâs any active superstar Jordan seems to view as a spiritual heir rather than a threat, itâs the Greek Freak.
⥠Ja Morant: âI Wouldâve Cooked Himâ
Ja Morantâs relationship with Michael Jordan exists mostly in quotes and speculation, but one line in particular ignited headlines.
In a 2022 interview with Taylor Rooks, Morant first praised Jordanâs mindset and influence on the game. Then, when pushed about a hypothetical one-on-one matchup, he declared:
âI would have cooked him, too. Nobody got more confidence than 12. Iâm never going to say nobody going to beat me one-on-one.â
It was, in essence, the kind of supreme confidence Jordan himself used to display. But because it was aimed at Jordan, the comment was instantly framed as disrespect. For someone who once dropped 51 points in response to being called a âcon man,â a young star publicly saying heâd âcookâ him is exactly the type of slight Jordan might quietly store away.
The situation worsened when ESPN accidentally aired a fake quote from a parody account implying Morant said Jordan would be âjust another superstarâ in todayâs game. The network apologized, but the damage was done. Social media treated it as further evidence of a generational gap between a new wave of fearless young players and Jordanâs fiercely loyal fanbase.
Morantâs repeated off-court issuesâparticularly his gun-related social media posts and subsequent suspensionsâalso collide with Jordanâs business interests. Jordan built a billion-dollar empire in part on a relatively clean, marketable image. A young face of the league jeopardizing that image would likely draw his disapproval.
đŻ Damian Lillard: Business Rivals, Philosophical Opposites
Damian Lillard has shown nothing but respect for Michael Jordan, often calling him the GOAT and describing meeting him at the NBAâs 75th anniversary event as an almost spiritual experience.
If thereâs tension, it likely exists around business and ideology rather than personal slights.
Lillard is a flagship athlete for Adidas, a direct competitor to Jordan Brand.
His shoe line, often priced more affordably than Jordans, offers a democratized alternative to Jordanâs premium, exclusivity-driven model.
Jordan nearly signed with Adidas early in his own career before joining Nike. Watching a widely respected star thrive as the face of the brand he almost choseâand one that briefly overtook Jordan Brand in U.S. sports footwear market shareâadds extra competitive spice.
On the court and in the media, Lillard has also pushed back on ring-obsessed narratives, arguing that greatness shouldnât be defined solely by championships. Thatâs a subtle challenge to Jordanâs own worldview, where rings have long been the ultimate trump card in debates.
Even so, Lillardâs open admiration means any âhateâ here is more hypothetical than credible.
đ§± Kyle Lowry: A Symbol of Hornets Frustration
Kyle Lowry is an unlikely name in any discussion about Michael Jordanâs grudges, yet his career intersects repeatedly with one of Jordanâs biggest failures: his time as owner of the Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets.
During Lowryâs prime with the Toronto Raptors, his teams went 25â11 against Charlotte. While the Hornets struggled to build a winner, Lowryâs gritty, charge-taking, steady leadership helped Toronto become a perennial playoff team and, eventually, a champion.
From Jordanâs vantage point as an owner who oversaw years of mediocrity, Lowry could easily become a symbolâa recurring antagonist in an era defined by losing.
Thereâs also a small statistical echo: at 37, Lowry set a record for most points off the bench in a playoff game, surpassing a mark set by a 38-year-old Jordan. The comparison is obscure, but for a man obsessed with competitive edges, any encroachment on his territory, however minor, can sting.
Still, thereâs no evidence of personal animosityâonly a pattern where Lowryâs success came at Jordanâs franchiseâs expense.
đ§© The Bigger Picture: A GOAT Guarding His Era
For all the social-media narratives about âplayers Michael Jordan hates,â reality is more nuanced.
With LeBron, the distance is real, fueled by overlapping legacies and a never-ending GOAT debate.
With Durant, Embiid, Morant, Young, and others, the flashpoints are quotes, decisions, and styles that clash with Jordanâs old-school ideals.
With Curry, Giannis, Lillard, Paul, Harden, Lowry, thereâs a blend of respect, quiet disagreement, and fan-manufactured drama.
If there is a common thread, itâs this:
Jordan came from an era where greatness meant staying home, taking the hits, beating your rivals, and leaving no doubt. Todayâs NBA values collaboration, player empowerment, social media presence, and a more fluid definition of success.
Jordan may never publicly unload on his successors. He doesnât need to. His legacy is cemented, his brand is global, his story already myth. But in every cold shoulder, every carefully worded text, every early morning message to a TV pundit, you can still feel the same competitive fire that once burned through the leagueâand that, perhaps more than any stat, is why his shadow still looms over everyone who dares chase him.