How Did Hitler Fund a Huge Military When Germany Was Broke?
In the early 20th century, Germany faced catastrophic economic crises that would have devastated any nation. The hyperinflation of 1923 rendered the currency nearly worthless, with everyday items costing billions of marks. Families faced unimaginable hardships, burning money for warmth as it became cheaper than firewood. Then came the Great Depression in 1929, which led to widespread unemployment and despair. By the time Adolf Hitler rose to power in January 1933, Germany was a nation on its knees—economically shattered and socially fractured.
Yet, astonishingly, just six years later, Germany was transformed into a formidable military force, ready to invade Poland with an army of three million soldiers, thousands of tanks, and aircraft—the most modern military in Europe. The question looms: how did this bankrupt nation finance such a massive rearmament? The answer lies in a web of financial deception, ingenious schemes, and ultimately, the grim necessity of war.
The Economic Landscape of Weimar Germany

To understand how Hitler financed his military ambitions, one must first grasp the dire economic conditions in Germany. The hyperinflation of 1923 was a cataclysmic event; a single U.S. dollar was worth four trillion marks. Workers demanded to be paid multiple times a day, as wages lost value by the evening. The middle class saw their savings evaporate overnight, and the country was left in chaos.
After a brief recovery, the Great Depression hit, leading to mass unemployment—over six million Germans were out of work by 1932. Families auctioned their possessions in desperation, and political violence erupted as extremist factions clashed in the streets. In this environment of despair, Hitler emerged, promising to restore German greatness and rebuild the military, despite the restrictions imposed by the Versailles Treaty, which limited Germany’s armed forces to 100,000 men and prohibited heavy weaponry.
The Architect of Deception: Hjalmar Schacht
Enter Hjalmar Schacht, a financial genius who had previously saved Germany from hyperinflation. Appointed by Hitler as the president of the Reichsbank in 1933 and later as the Minister of Economics, Schacht was tasked with the impossible: fund a massive rearmament program without triggering inflation or alerting foreign governments.
Schacht devised a plan involving a shell company known as Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft (MEO). On paper, MEO was a research consortium, but in reality, it served as a front to facilitate the funding of the military buildup. The government paid arms manufacturers with MEO bills—promissory notes that promised payment in five years. This allowed the regime to keep military spending off the official balance sheets, hiding the scale of rearmament from the international community.
The Mechanics of the Scheme
Here’s how the scheme worked: when an arms manufacturer received MEO bills instead of cash, they would take these bills to a private bank, which, knowing the Reichsbank would honor them, would provide real cash—albeit at a discount. The private bank would then present the MEO bills to the Reichsbank for conversion into cash. Importantly, these transactions never appeared on the official Reichsbank balance sheet, making the military funding effectively invisible.
Between 1934 and 1938, Germany issued an astonishing 12 billion Reichsmarks in MEO bills—more than the nation’s entire national debt just a few years prior. By 1936, Germany had secretly violated every military restriction set by the Versailles Treaty, yet foreign powers remained oblivious to the extent of Germany’s rearmament.
The Inevitable Collapse
However, this financial house of cards was not sustainable. The MEO bills were set to mature in 1939, and Germany faced a stark reality: it lacked the funds to pay them back. Schacht warned Hitler that the economy was overheating and that the spending was unsustainable, urging a balanced budget to avoid inflation. But Hitler, driven by an insatiable need for expansion, dismissed these warnings.
As the first MEO bills came due, Germany needed a solution. The answer was not austerity but aggression. In March 1938, Germany annexed Austria, seizing its gold reserves and industrial assets. Later that year, the Munich Agreement allowed Germany to take the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia, followed by the occupation of the rest of the country. Each conquest provided resources and wealth needed to fund the military machine.
The Economic Model of Conquest
The Nazi economy was parasitic, relying on constant conquest to sustain itself. The regime systematically looted occupied territories, extracting gold, currency, and industrial equipment. In France, the German occupiers imposed heavy occupation costs, effectively forcing the French to pay for their own subjugation.
Moreover, the regime exploited forced labor from concentration camps, using prisoners to produce weapons and other goods. Companies like IG Farben and Siemens profited immensely from this brutal system, where human lives were expendable.
The Volkswagen scheme epitomized the regime’s deceit. Germans were promised affordable cars if they saved through the Deutsche Arbeitsfront, but the funds collected were redirected to military production, leaving savers empty-handed.
The Role of External Financing
Interestingly, Germany also utilized loans from foreign powers to fund its military ambitions. In the 1920s and early 1930s, Germany borrowed heavily from Britain, France, and the United States, ostensibly to pay reparations under the Versailles Treaty. However, when Hitler came to power, he ceased reparations payments but retained the borrowed funds, using them to build the very military that would later invade those same nations.
Additionally, the regime engaged in the systematic theft of Jewish property, confiscating businesses, homes, and assets to finance its operations. This act of genocide was not only a moral atrocity but also a crucial component of the Nazi economic model.
The Collapse of the Ponzi Scheme
By 1939, the Nazi economy was teetering on the brink of collapse. The MEO bills were coming due, and the regime found itself unable to pay without further plundering. As historian Adam Tooze noted, Nazi Germany was living on borrowed time, with an economic model that required constant warfare to survive.
When Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, it wasn’t merely an act of aggression; it was a desperate attempt to secure resources and stave off economic collapse. The war was not just an ideological crusade but a grim necessity for a regime that had built its economy on a foundation of lies, theft, and violence.
As the war progressed and Germany began to lose territory, the economic model unraveled. The regime could no longer plunder new resources, leading to shortages and inflation. The Nazi economy, much like a Ponzi scheme, was unsustainable; it relied on the continuous influx of new conquests to survive.
Conclusion: The Inevitable War
In retrospect, the question arises: was the war inevitable? Given the structural flaws of the Nazi economy, the answer leans toward yes. Hitler’s regime was built on a financial scam that could only function through expansion and conquest. The moment Germany ceased to grow, the entire structure was destined to collapse.
The narrative of how Hitler funded his military ambitions reveals a horrifying truth: the Nazi economy was not merely a product of ideology but a system designed to necessitate war. Through deception, theft, and brutality, the regime constructed a façade of strength that ultimately crumbled under the weight of its own contradictions.
In the end, the war was not just a battle for territory or power; it was a desperate struggle for survival in a regime built on unsustainable foundations. Hitler’s choices led to devastation not only for Europe but also for Germany itself, culminating in a catastrophic downfall that echoed through history. The lessons of this dark chapter remind us of the dangers of unchecked ambition and the moral compromises made in the name of power.