CNN Reporter STUNNED as Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Obama’s Role in Russia Collusion Scheme

In a dramatic exchange that quickly went viral, a CNN reporter found herself on the defensive after US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard dismantled the prevailing narrative surrounding the Russia collusion investigation. The encounter, highlighted by Dave Rubin on “The Rubin Report,” exposed the tangled web of intelligence, political agendas, and media complicity that fueled one of the most controversial episodes of recent American history.

The Question That Backfired

During a press briefing, CNN’s Caitlyn Collins pressed Gabbard about past intelligence assessments—specifically the 2017 Senate Intelligence Committee report, which was signed off by every Republican on the committee, including then-acting chair Marco Rubio (now Secretary of State). Collins asked:

“Are you saying that [Rubio] is wrong in that statement that he made then? And secondly, what would you say to people who believe that you’re only releasing these documents now to improve your standing with the president after he said that your intelligence assessments were wrong?”

Gabbard, refusing to be cornered, immediately corrected Collins:

“First, I want to correct something that you stated which was citing the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report as being one and the same [as the intelligence community’s assessments]. The Senate Intelligence Committee has a very different function than the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.”

Tulsi Gabbard’s Smoking Gun

Gabbard then addressed both points with clarity and authority:

– She acknowledged Rubio’s statement that there was “irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling,” but emphasized that the outrage was not the meddling itself, but the subsequent narrative constructed by the intelligence community.
– Gabbard asserted that the intelligence community “was concocting this narrative that the president colluded with the Russians, that the president’s son was holding secret meetings with the Russians. All of these lies… that were never true.”
– She highlighted Rubio’s own criticism of the FBI’s reliance on the infamous Steele Dossier, which was paid for by the Clinton campaign and widely disseminated by major media outlets—including CNN.

Gabbard concluded, “The evidence and the intelligence that has been declassified and released is irrefutable.” She made clear that the new documents provided proof of a deliberate plan—one that she implied was orchestrated at the highest levels, including by former President Barack Obama.

The Media’s Role and the Fallout

Dave Rubin, reacting to the clip, praised Gabbard’s directness and the clarity with which she exposed the flaws in the media’s reporting. He pointed out how Collins’ attempt to use Rubio’s statement as a shield for the Russia collusion narrative fell apart in the face of Gabbard’s detailed rebuttal.

Rubin noted:

“You basically have Caitlyn Collins from CNN saying, ‘Oh, well, Marco Rubio said back then that there was something troubling here.’ And [Gabbard’s] like, ‘Yeah, there was something troubling here, but he didn’t know all of the evidence. And now we have evidence that there was a plan concocted except it was Obama.'”

This moment underscored the dangers of media outlets relying on incomplete or misleading intelligence, and the risks of political narratives overshadowing hard evidence.

The Larger Implications

The Russia collusion saga has haunted American politics for years, shaping public opinion and fueling partisan divides. Gabbard’s revelations—backed by newly declassified documents—suggest that the origins of the controversy were far more political than previously acknowledged, involving deliberate efforts to undermine the Trump presidency.

The humiliation of the CNN reporter is emblematic of a broader reckoning for the media, which must now grapple with its role in perpetuating misinformation and failing to challenge official narratives. As more details emerge, the public will demand accountability—not just from politicians, but from journalists entrusted with the truth.

Conclusion

The explosive exchange between Tulsi Gabbard and CNN’s Caitlyn Collins marks a turning point in the ongoing debate over the Russia collusion investigation. With new evidence pointing to political manipulation at the highest levels, Americans are left to reconsider what they thought they knew about one of the most divisive chapters in recent history.

Gabbard’s insistence on transparency and her willingness to confront uncomfortable truths may signal a new era for intelligence and media in the United States—one where facts, not narratives, finally take center stage.