Michael Jordan Finally Explains His Real Opinion on LeBron James—The Reason Is Harsh, Unexpected, and Fans Are Divided Worldwide

🏀 Inside Michael Jordan’s Silent War With Today’s NBA Stars

.

.

.

Michael Jordan has been retired for over two decades, but the competitive fire that defined his career hasn’t gone anywhere. On the surface, he’s the revered global icon, the standard against whom all others are measured. Beneath that, fans and analysts see something more complex: a legend quietly guarding his throne while a new generation questions, challenges, and sometimes outright provokes his legacy.

From LeBron James chasing every one of his records, to Kevin Durant questioning his stamina, to Joel Embiid flatly denying his GOAT status, the tension between Jordan and active stars reveals a deeper clash of eras, values, and definitions of greatness.

Below is a look at how Michael Jordan’s name collides with today’s biggest players—where the respect is real, where the friction is obvious, and where the “hate” might be more fan fiction than fact.

👑 LeBron James: Rival in Absentia

Michael Jordan has never publicly said he hates LeBron James. He rarely even talks about him in depth. But for years, the distance between them has spoken louder than any quote.

The dynamic began in the early 2000s, when a teenage LeBron was hailed as “the next Jordan” before playing an NBA game. That narrative unfolded while Jordan was on his Wizards comeback and, according to reports, it didn’t sit well.

Their relationship has remained distant, professional at best. ESPN’s Brian Windhorst has noted they are not close, and their personalities point in opposite directions:

Jordan: obsessed with being feared, ruthless, confrontational, weaponizing every slight.
LeBron: collaborative, openly social, building superteams and friendships, seeking global acceptance.

The GOAT debate has turned this contrast into a cold rivalry. As LeBron climbed past Kareem Abdul-Jabbar to become the NBA’s all-time leading scorer and continued stacking records, every milestone invited comparisons to Jordan’s previously untouchable status.

Jordan addressed those comparisons in Paris by downplaying direct debates and emphasizing era differences—his tone respectful, but measured. In 2025, LeBron admitted that Jordan “doesn’t want to talk to me until I’m done,” suggesting Jordan keeps his distance while LeBron is still actively chasing history in the iconic No. 23.

Social media has amplified the storyline: Jordan is seen as warmer toward Kobe Bryant and Stephen Curry—players whose legacies don’t directly threaten his GOAT status—while keeping LeBron at arm’s length. Whether that’s legacy protection or pure competitiveness, it underscores one philosophical divide:

Jordan’s greatness was built on being universally feared.
LeBron’s is built on being universally loved.

🎯 Kevin Durant: The Superteam Snub and the Baseball Jab

Kevin Durant has always praised Michael Jordan, insisting he’d dominate any era and calling him the GOAT. But admiration hasn’t stopped tension from creeping into the narrative.

In 2017, Jordan defended Durant’s decision to join the 73-win Golden State Warriors, stating Durant had the right to go wherever he wanted. Yet he added he personally wouldn’t have made the same choice. To Jordan, who stayed with Chicago through years of heartbreak before winning titles, joining a ready-made juggernaut likely falls short of the mental toughness he values.

The most direct friction came in 2025 on LeBron James’ podcast. Durant, talking about commitment and “going 22 straight,” made a barely-veiled reference to Jordan’s 1993 retirement to play baseball:

“Some people say, ‘I want to go play baseball… and then I want to come back.’
Well, some people say, I’m going to go 22 straight.”

Given that Jordan stepped away after his father’s murder, many saw this as disrespectful. Durant later clarified that Jordan is still the GOAT but doubled down that “MJ retired three times” and that it’s fair to point that out.

For a man who once invited his high school coach to his Hall of Fame speech just to publicly call him out, and who never forgave Isaiah Thomas for old playoff wars, Jordan is not famous for letting things go. Durant’s career choices—joining Golden State, then leaving, then searching for ideal situations—represent a modern brand of “ring chasing” that clashes with Jordan’s old-school grind-and-conquer ethos.

To Jordan, greatness is built with your team, not by jumping to the one that already broke the league.

💦 Stephen Curry: Respect, Revolution, and a Generational Divide

Stephen Curry may be the modern star Jordan respects most, but their relationship still reveals the gap between eras.

Jordan has repeatedly praised Curry, once texting ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith at 5:54 a.m. to call him “by far the best shooter of all time.” He has offered him advice on handling defeat and appears more mentor than rival.

Two moments, however, sparked debate:

2019 Pickup Comment
Asked to name his all-time pickup team, Jordan chose Hakeem Olajuwon, Magic Johnson, Scottie Pippen, and James Worthy, adding that Curry was “a great player, not a Hall of Famer yet.”
Context matters: Curry was still active and ineligible for Hall of Fame consideration. Jordan was being technical; the internet turned it into disrespect.
2023 Point Guard Debate
When Curry said he believed he was the greatest point guard of all time, Jordan again texted Stephen A. Smith—another 5:54 a.m. message—to disagree, insisting Magic Johnson still holds that crown. He called Curry revolutionary, the greatest shooter ever, and “very close” to Magic, but placed him second.

Jordan’s reasoning reflects his lens: Magic’s five titles, triple-double dominance, and traditional point guard duties still define the position in his mind.

Underneath that is a deeper basketball split. Jordan played in a league built on mid-range mastery and physicality; he shot 32.7% from three, rarely taking more than two per game. Curry, at around 42.6% from deep, rewired the sport. Kids now grow up copying 30-foot step-backs instead of footwork and post-ups.

Jordan may admire Curry’s genius while quietly viewing the modern three-happy game as a dilution of “real basketball.” Yet in this case, the supposed “hate” is mostly an internet invention. The evidence we have shows genuine respect on both sides.

✋ James Harden: Fouls, Stats, and a Different Definition of Greatness

On paper, Michael Jordan has had kind words for James Harden, especially during Harden’s peak in Houston, when he compared Harden’s scoring explosions to his own.

Beneath the compliments, though, their games sit at opposite ends of the stylistic spectrum.

Harden’s style: isolation-heavy, step-back threes, foul baiting, deliberately seeking contact.
Jordan’s era: brutal defense, hand-checking, fewer whistles, where players were expected to absorb hits, not hunt them.

The divide widened in 2019 when then-Rockets GM Daryl Morey argued it was “factual” that Harden was a better scorer than Jordan based on points per possession. Many saw that as sacrilege. Jordan, whose identity is intertwined with scoring titles and a perfect 6–0 Finals record, would have every reason to take that personally.

Harden’s lack of a championship, multiple trade requests, and reputation for playoff disappointments form a modern archetype Jordan probably despises: a superstar whose individual brilliance never fully translates to ultimate winning. Even if Jordan respects Harden’s talent, the philosophies they represent could not be more different.

😈 Joel Embiid: Trash Talk and a GOAT Rejection

There is no record of a direct feud between Joel Embiid and Michael Jordan—but Embiid has said things that would, in classic Jordan fashion, go straight onto the mental bulletin board.

Embiid is a relentless trash talker, a showman who taunts rivals and celebrates loudly. He’s also a master troll online, turning social media into a second arena. Jordan played in an era without Twitter, but he loathed any semblance of gloating. Given how he held onto grudges against players like Isaiah Thomas, Embiid’s antics would likely provoke him.

The clearest flashpoint is a 2019 interview with The Ringer, where Embiid dismissed Jordan as the GOAT and chose Wilt Chamberlain instead:

“He’s not the GOAT. To me, you got Wilt Chamberlain. He’s got all the records and no one is ever going to beat them.”

Dennis Rodman responded by telling Embiid to “shut the f*** up,” underscoring how sacred Jordan’s status remains for his peers.

For a man whose legacy partly relies on near-universal recognition as the greatest ever, a dominant modern MVP flatly denying that status would not go unnoticed.

🧠 Chris Paul: Business, Power, and the Veto That Changed Everything

Chris Paul is a longtime Jordan Brand athlete, signed since 2006—on paper, a sign of deep respect from Jordan. Yet their paths intersect in ways that hint at underlying tension.

The most famous flashpoint is the vetoed 2011 trade that would have sent Paul to the Los Angeles Lakers to join Kobe Bryant. As owner of the then-Charlotte Bobcats, Jordan was among the small-market owners who pushed commissioner David Stern to block the deal, publicly arguing for the importance of competitive balance and keeping stars in smaller markets.

Critics have long suspected that there was more at play: Jordan, fiercely protective of his legacy and wary of mega-teams that could rewrite history, may not have wanted to see another supercharged Lakers dynasty rise.

A second, more light-hearted moment turned into viral legend in 2016 at Jordan’s basketball camp, when Paul bet that if Jordan missed three shots, the kids would get free Jordans. Jordan hit everything. A fake quote—“F*** them kids”—circulated afterward, so believable that it cemented the image of Jordan as a ruthless competitor who won’t bend, not even for children or friends.

Add to this Paul’s role as a vocal union leader and advocate for player empowerment, and he stands in philosophical contrast with Jordan’s more owner-aligned, old-school perspective. Still, visible evidence of genuine personal animosity is scarce. This is a relationship defined more by subtext than open conflict.

🔥 Trae Young: The “Sixth Man” GOAT and a Snub in Greece

Trae Young has never gone to war with Michael Jordan, but his decisions and style fit perfectly into the kind of behavior that would irritate the ultra-prideful legend.

The first public eyebrow-raiser came when Young named his all-time starting five and placed Jordan as his sixth man, choosing Kobe Bryant and Kevin Durant on the wings instead. His explanation—that he couldn’t move Durant from the small forward spot because KD was one of his idols—put personal bias ahead of historical consensus.

To most, it was a youthful, personal list. To a competitor like Jordan, being benched by a current player and Jordan Brand athlete could feel like a slap in the face.

In 2025, Young reportedly declined an invitation to a high-profile Jordan Brand event in Greece to attend Summer League with his Hawks teammates. From Jordan’s perspective—rooted in hierarchy and deference to legends—turning down a personal invitation for a less glamorous obligation could be interpreted as disrespectful.

On the court, Young’s deep threes, foul hunting, and nutmegs embody a modern flair that older generations sometimes view as showboating. He has embraced the villain role—silencing Madison Square Garden, shushing crowds—but without the ring résumé that usually accompanies that level of bravado. That combination of swagger and limited playoff success is exactly the sort of thing Jordan tended to punish ruthlessly.

🦌 Giannis Antetokounmpo: The Rare Modern Star Jordan Truly Embraces

If most of Jordan’s interactions with modern stars are marked by distance or tension, Giannis Antetokounmpo is the notable exception.

Jordan has gone out of his way to praise the Bucks superstar. According to reports, he once called Stephen A. Smith at age 59 specifically to argue that Giannis deserved MVP over Nikola Jokić and Joel Embiid, allegedly cursing at Smith for disagreeing. That kind of unsolicited advocacy is almost unheard of from Jordan.

Their brief in-person interaction at the NBA’s 75th anniversary celebration left a big impression on Giannis, who described Jordan hugging him and telling him that the way he plays hard is “inspiring.” Giannis has repeatedly spoken of Jordan with reverence, and even joked that people shouldn’t “bark at” Jordan because he might “choke someone” for being disrespectful—a joke that simultaneously acknowledges Jordan’s intimidating aura and his thin-skinned competitiveness.

Giannis checks the boxes Jordan cares about: relentless motor, physical dominance, devotion to improvement, and emotional investment in winning. If there’s any active superstar Jordan seems to view as a spiritual heir rather than a threat, it’s the Greek Freak.

⚡ Ja Morant: “I Would’ve Cooked Him”

Ja Morant’s relationship with Michael Jordan exists mostly in quotes and speculation, but one line in particular ignited headlines.

In a 2022 interview with Taylor Rooks, Morant first praised Jordan’s mindset and influence on the game. Then, when pushed about a hypothetical one-on-one matchup, he declared:

“I would have cooked him, too. Nobody got more confidence than 12. I’m never going to say nobody going to beat me one-on-one.”

It was, in essence, the kind of supreme confidence Jordan himself used to display. But because it was aimed at Jordan, the comment was instantly framed as disrespect. For someone who once dropped 51 points in response to being called a “con man,” a young star publicly saying he’d “cook” him is exactly the type of slight Jordan might quietly store away.

The situation worsened when ESPN accidentally aired a fake quote from a parody account implying Morant said Jordan would be “just another superstar” in today’s game. The network apologized, but the damage was done. Social media treated it as further evidence of a generational gap between a new wave of fearless young players and Jordan’s fiercely loyal fanbase.

Morant’s repeated off-court issues—particularly his gun-related social media posts and subsequent suspensions—also collide with Jordan’s business interests. Jordan built a billion-dollar empire in part on a relatively clean, marketable image. A young face of the league jeopardizing that image would likely draw his disapproval.

🎯 Damian Lillard: Business Rivals, Philosophical Opposites

Damian Lillard has shown nothing but respect for Michael Jordan, often calling him the GOAT and describing meeting him at the NBA’s 75th anniversary event as an almost spiritual experience.

If there’s tension, it likely exists around business and ideology rather than personal slights.

Lillard is a flagship athlete for Adidas, a direct competitor to Jordan Brand.
His shoe line, often priced more affordably than Jordans, offers a democratized alternative to Jordan’s premium, exclusivity-driven model.

Jordan nearly signed with Adidas early in his own career before joining Nike. Watching a widely respected star thrive as the face of the brand he almost chose—and one that briefly overtook Jordan Brand in U.S. sports footwear market share—adds extra competitive spice.

On the court and in the media, Lillard has also pushed back on ring-obsessed narratives, arguing that greatness shouldn’t be defined solely by championships. That’s a subtle challenge to Jordan’s own worldview, where rings have long been the ultimate trump card in debates.

Even so, Lillard’s open admiration means any “hate” here is more hypothetical than credible.

🧱 Kyle Lowry: A Symbol of Hornets Frustration

Kyle Lowry is an unlikely name in any discussion about Michael Jordan’s grudges, yet his career intersects repeatedly with one of Jordan’s biggest failures: his time as owner of the Charlotte Bobcats/Hornets.

During Lowry’s prime with the Toronto Raptors, his teams went 25–11 against Charlotte. While the Hornets struggled to build a winner, Lowry’s gritty, charge-taking, steady leadership helped Toronto become a perennial playoff team and, eventually, a champion.

From Jordan’s vantage point as an owner who oversaw years of mediocrity, Lowry could easily become a symbol—a recurring antagonist in an era defined by losing.

There’s also a small statistical echo: at 37, Lowry set a record for most points off the bench in a playoff game, surpassing a mark set by a 38-year-old Jordan. The comparison is obscure, but for a man obsessed with competitive edges, any encroachment on his territory, however minor, can sting.

Still, there’s no evidence of personal animosity—only a pattern where Lowry’s success came at Jordan’s franchise’s expense.

🧩 The Bigger Picture: A GOAT Guarding His Era

For all the social-media narratives about “players Michael Jordan hates,” reality is more nuanced.

With LeBron, the distance is real, fueled by overlapping legacies and a never-ending GOAT debate.
With Durant, Embiid, Morant, Young, and others, the flashpoints are quotes, decisions, and styles that clash with Jordan’s old-school ideals.
With Curry, Giannis, Lillard, Paul, Harden, Lowry, there’s a blend of respect, quiet disagreement, and fan-manufactured drama.

If there is a common thread, it’s this:
Jordan came from an era where greatness meant staying home, taking the hits, beating your rivals, and leaving no doubt. Today’s NBA values collaboration, player empowerment, social media presence, and a more fluid definition of success.

Jordan may never publicly unload on his successors. He doesn’t need to. His legacy is cemented, his brand is global, his story already myth. But in every cold shoulder, every carefully worded text, every early morning message to a TV pundit, you can still feel the same competitive fire that once burned through the league—and that, perhaps more than any stat, is why his shadow still looms over everyone who dares chase him.