🚨RACE BAITER Elle Duncan can’t stand the fact that Angel is NOWHERE near the Player Caitlin is!
.
.
.
play video:
Controversy Erupts: Elle Duncan, Angel Reese, and the Debate Over Caitlin Clark’s WNBA Stardom
The conversation around women’s basketball in 2024 is as passionate and polarizing as it’s ever been. At the center of the storm are three names: Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese, and ESPN’s Elle Duncan. While Clark’s on-court excellence continues to capture headlines and break records, the off-court discourse has grown increasingly heated, with accusations of “race baiting,” favoritism, and double standards swirling across social media and sports talk platforms.
A recent viral podcast episode took direct aim at ESPN anchor Elle Duncan, accusing her and the network of stoking racial tension and undermining Clark’s accomplishments in favor of Angel Reese. The episode’s host, echoing a sentiment found in many online circles, labeled Duncan a “race baiting specialist” and argued that ESPN’s coverage is less about basketball and more about identity politics.
In this article, we’ll break down the controversy, examine the claims, and explore what it says about the current state of women’s sports, media coverage, and the intersection of race and recognition in American athletics.
Caitlin Clark: The Meteoric Rise
Caitlin Clark’s impact on the WNBA has been nothing short of revolutionary. In her first two seasons, she’s shattered records for assists, double-doubles, and triple-doubles, and her games have brought unprecedented attention to the Indiana Fever and the league as a whole. Clark’s style—deep three-pointers, flashy passes, and relentless competitiveness—has made her a fan favorite and a marketing phenomenon.
Her rise, however, has not come without controversy. As Clark’s stardom has soared, so too has the scrutiny—both of her play and of how she’s covered by the media. Some see her as the face the WNBA has long needed, while others argue that the attention she receives is disproportionate, especially when compared to Black stars like Angel Reese.
Angel Reese: The Other Star
Angel Reese, meanwhile, is a force in her own right. The former LSU standout and now a Chicago Sky forward is charismatic, tough, and a proven winner. Reese’s college rivalry with Clark, including their iconic NCAA Tournament showdown, fueled record ratings and brought new fans to women’s basketball.
Yet, as the podcast host notes, the conversation often becomes less about basketball and more about narratives—about who gets celebrated, who gets criticized, and why. The host accuses ESPN, and Duncan specifically, of “pandering” to Reese despite her having, in his words, a “lesser skill set” compared to Clark. He frames this as part of a broader trend of elevating certain players for reasons unrelated to their on-court performance.
Elle Duncan and ESPN: Accusations of “Race Baiting”
At the heart of the controversy is Elle Duncan, a prominent ESPN anchor known for her commentary on sports and culture. The podcast episode singles out Duncan, branding her a “race baiting specialist” and suggesting that her support of Reese is less about basketball and more about identity politics and DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives at ESPN.
The host’s critique is twofold: first, that Duncan and others are unwilling to acknowledge Clark’s superiority as a player; and second, that they are quick to assign racial motives to any support Clark receives, especially from high-profile figures like LeBron James. “If LeBron James posts that Caitlin Clark is his favorite player, then he’s getting [criticized] for not protecting Black women,” the host claims. “If you post Angel Reese is your favorite, then you’re trying to stifle Caitlin Clark’s greatness.”
The host argues that this dynamic is toxic, divisive, and ultimately undermines the growth of the game. He insists that most fans—himself included—just want to talk basketball, but are forced to engage with narratives about race and identity because of how ESPN and its personalities frame the conversation.
The Role of Media in Shaping Narratives
To understand this controversy, it’s important to recognize the outsized role media plays in shaping sports narratives. ESPN is the largest sports network in the world, and its personalities—from Stephen A. Smith to Elle Duncan—wield tremendous influence over how stories are told and which athletes are celebrated.
The accusation that ESPN is “race baiting” is not new. Critics have long charged that the network is more interested in controversy and clicks than in fair, balanced coverage. In the case of Clark and Reese, the lines have become especially blurred, with every highlight, tweet, or interview dissected for evidence of bias.
Duncan, for her part, has pushed back against these claims. In recent on-air comments, she lamented the “disingenuous space” of current WNBA discourse and expressed frustration that no one seems willing to listen to other perspectives. Yet, as the podcast host points out, this is often interpreted as an attempt to silence criticism or to avoid confronting uncomfortable truths about favoritism and media framing.
Fans, Identity, and the Growth of the WNBA
The debate over Clark and Reese is, at its core, a debate about what women’s basketball should be—and who it’s for. Clark’s meteoric rise has brought in new fans, many of whom are less interested in the league’s history or its internal politics than in watching great basketball. For these fans, Clark’s game speaks for itself, and any attempt to qualify or diminish her accomplishments is seen as sour grapes or, worse, as racially motivated.
Others, however, see Clark’s ascendance as part of a familiar pattern in American sports, where white athletes are celebrated as “transcendent” while Black athletes are expected to work twice as hard for half the recognition. For these fans, the conversation is inseparable from the country’s broader struggles with race, representation, and power.
The podcast host rejects this framing, insisting that “no one’s making this thing about race” except ESPN and its commentators. He argues that fans and independent content creators are the ones truly growing the game by focusing on basketball, not identity politics.
The LeBron James Factor
LeBron James’s public support for Clark has added fuel to the fire. As the NBA’s most prominent star, his endorsement carries weight. The host suggests that James sees something of himself in Clark—a player who faces outsized scrutiny, who elevates her team, and who is sometimes resented for her success. James’s praise for Clark is interpreted by some as a snub to Reese and other Black players, a dynamic that the host dismisses as both unfair and unhelpful.
“Name a company that’s going to invest in a bad employee, name a business that’s going to invest in a bad investor,” he says. “It doesn’t matter what color you are… If you’re good, you’re good.”
The Real Issue: Basketball or Bias?
At the end of the day, the question is whether the conversation can return to basketball. The host argues that Clark herself would prefer the focus be on the game—on her teammates like Aliyah Boston and Kelsey Mitchell, on the Fever’s playoff hopes, and on the quality of play across the league. He calls for “fair assessments, fair analysis,” and less emphasis on race and controversy.
Yet, as long as the media ecosystem rewards hot takes and social media outrage, it’s unlikely the conversation will quiet down. The WNBA’s newfound visibility is a double-edged sword: more attention means more scrutiny, more debate, and more opportunities for controversy.
Conclusion: Where Do We Go From Here?
The Elle Duncan-Angel Reese-Caitlin Clark controversy is emblematic of larger tensions in American sports and society. It’s about who gets to tell the story, whose achievements are celebrated, and how identity shapes our understanding of greatness.
On one side are fans and commentators who want to keep the focus on basketball, who see Clark as a generational talent and resent any attempt to diminish her. On the other are those who believe that the conversation cannot—and should not—be separated from questions of race, representation, and equity.
For the WNBA, the challenge is to harness this passion for growth rather than division. Clark and Reese are both extraordinary athletes, and the league is stronger for having them. As the Fever continue their rise and the Sky rebuild around Reese, the hope is that the conversation can shift from controversy to competition.
But as long as the media—both mainstream and independent—thrives on conflict, the debate is unlikely to disappear. The best hope for fans is to follow Clark’s lead: let the game speak for itself, celebrate greatness wherever it appears, and remember that the real enemy isn’t each other, but indifference.
