Caitlin Clark Done DIRTY by HATEFUL WNBA Players! Vote Her 9th among Guards in All Star Rank!
.
.
.
Caitlin Clark Snubbed by WNBA Players in All-Star Voting: Jealousy, Rivalry, or Something More?
The 2025 WNBA All-Star Game is fast approaching, and the spotlight is shining brighter than ever on the league’s most polarizing rookie, Caitlin Clark. Despite leading the league in assists and ranking among the top scorers, Clark’s journey to All-Star captaincy has been marred by controversy—not from the fans or the media, but from her fellow players. The latest All-Star voting results reveal a deep and unsettling rift within the league, raising questions about sportsmanship, jealousy, and the pressures of newfound celebrity in women’s basketball.
The Voting Breakdown: Fans vs. Players
Caitlin Clark, the Indiana Fever’s sensational guard, has captivated basketball fans across the nation since her debut. Her electrifying play, record-breaking college career, and charismatic presence have made her a household name. When All-Star voting opened, it was little surprise that Clark received a record-shattering 2.93 million fan votes, making her the top vote-getter and earning her the coveted All-Star captain role alongside Napheesa Collier.
But beneath the surface of this fanfare lies a more complicated story. While Clark finished first in fan voting and third in media voting, she was shockingly ranked ninth among guards in the player vote. This glaring disparity has ignited a firestorm of debate, with critics accusing WNBA players of disrespect, jealousy, and even outright hostility toward the league’s brightest star.
The Numbers Don’t Lie
To understand the controversy, it’s important to break down the numbers. The WNBA All-Star selection process is weighted: fan votes count for 50%, while media and player votes each account for 25%. Clark’s overwhelming fan support and strong media showing should have made her a lock for one of the top guard spots. Instead, her weighted score—3.5—was just enough to secure her a starting position, narrowly edging out other contenders like Paige Bueckers, who herself has enjoyed a stellar rookie season.
But it’s the player vote that stands out. Among her peers, Clark was ranked ninth among guards—an astonishing snub for someone tied for the league lead in assists (8.9 per game) and averaging 18 points per contest. She’s already recorded a triple-double in her rookie season and has been the driving force behind a resurgent Indiana Fever team, not to mention the massive television ratings and sold-out arenas wherever she plays.
The Backlash: Is It Justified?
So why the disconnect? Why are WNBA players so reluctant to give Clark her due?
Some point to her popularity as the source of resentment. Clark’s meteoric rise has brought unprecedented attention—and revenue—to the league. Television ratings for Fever games have skyrocketed, and the WNBA All-Star Game itself is expected to break last year’s all-time viewership record, in large part because of Clark’s presence. For a league that has long struggled for mainstream relevance, Clark’s impact is undeniable.
Yet, this very success seems to have bred animosity. “The level of disrespect by these players in the league is putrid,” one commentator noted. “For everything she’s done for these players and this league so far, they can’t stand her.” The evidence is not just anecdotal: Clark has been on the receiving end of hard fouls, trash talk, and even memes mocking her turnovers and shooting slumps. Detractors have circulated images of Bart Simpson holding a “participation trophy” cake for Clark, pointing to her three-point shooting percentage (around 30%) and arguing that she doesn’t deserve an All-Star spot.
But the numbers—and the fans—disagree. Clark’s stats are not only All-Star worthy; they are historic for a rookie. She has handled the pressure and physicality of the league with poise, even as she’s become a lightning rod for criticism both on and off the court.
The Double Standard
The treatment of Clark raises uncomfortable questions about double standards and the culture of women’s sports. Would a male rookie, bringing in millions of new fans and revitalizing a league, be met with such resistance from his peers? Or is Clark’s experience a reflection of deeper issues within the WNBA—issues of hierarchy, insecurity, and perhaps a reluctance to embrace change?
Some players have been candid about their feelings. There is a sense among veterans and even some younger stars that Clark’s fame has come too easily, that she hasn’t “paid her dues” or endured the same struggles as those who toiled in relative obscurity. But this argument ignores the reality: Clark’s journey from Iowa to the WNBA was paved with hard work, record-breaking performances, and the same sacrifices every professional athlete makes.
Others suggest that the league’s marketing machine has focused too heavily on Clark, to the detriment of established stars like A’ja Wilson, Breanna Stewart, and Nneka Ogwumike. It’s a valid point—media narratives often favor the new and shiny. But it’s also true that Clark’s arrival has lifted all boats. The All-Star Game is in Indianapolis this year, and it’s expected to draw the largest crowd in league history. Every player, from starter to reserve, stands to benefit from the increased exposure and revenue.
The Physical Toll
The animosity hasn’t been limited to voting booths and social media. On the court, Clark has been the target of repeated hard fouls and physical play. In at least four or five games this season, she’s taken hits that would be more at home in a hockey rink than a basketball court. Critics argue that this is simply “welcome to the league” treatment, a rite of passage for any rookie. But the frequency and intensity of the contact suggest something more—a determination among some players to humble the newcomer, to remind her that stardom comes at a price.
Clark, for her part, has handled the adversity with grace. She rarely complains, instead focusing on her game and her team. Her coach has publicly defended her, while fans and media alike have called for greater protection and respect.
The Broader Impact
Lost in the controversy is the bigger picture: Caitlin Clark is good for the WNBA. Her presence has brought new fans, new sponsorships, and new opportunities for every player. The All-Star Game, once a niche event, is now a marquee attraction, with ticket sales and TV ratings to match. Merchandise sales have soared, and young girls across the country are wearing Fever jerseys and dreaming of their own place in the league.
Yet, the player vote suggests that not everyone is ready to embrace this new era. Some would rather cling to old rivalries and resentments, even if it means undermining the league’s growth. As one commentator put it, “These players don’t care. If it was up to them, they’d rather keep getting watched by nobody and keep living off the NBA. They’d be just fine with that.”
The Path Forward
What does this mean for Clark and for the WNBA? In the short term, Clark will continue to play her game, lead her team, and draw crowds wherever she goes. She will start in the All-Star Game, and the league will celebrate her achievements—at least publicly.
But the rift among players is real, and it cannot be ignored. If the WNBA is to continue its upward trajectory, it must find a way to bridge the gap between old and new, between established stars and rising icons. Respect must flow both ways: veterans deserve recognition for their contributions, but newcomers like Clark deserve a fair shake, free from pettiness and jealousy.
The All-Star voting process itself may also need to be revisited. If the goal is to showcase the league’s best and brightest, then the system must reflect both merit and popularity, without allowing personal animosities to overshadow excellence.
Conclusion: A League at a Crossroads
Caitlin Clark’s All-Star snub by her fellow players is more than a personal slight; it’s a symptom of a league in transition. The WNBA is growing, evolving, and attracting new fans at a pace never before seen. But with growth comes growing pains, and the challenge now is to ensure that the league’s culture keeps pace with its success.
Clark’s story is not just about basketball. It’s about resilience, leadership, and the courage to stand tall in the face of adversity. It’s about the power of sport to unite and inspire, even when old wounds and rivalries threaten to tear it apart.
As the All-Star Game approaches, all eyes will be on Indianapolis—and on Caitlin Clark. The fans have spoken, the media has weighed in, and now the players must decide: will they continue to let jealousy and resentment define the league, or will they embrace the future and the promise that Clark represents?
Whatever happens, one thing is clear: Caitlin Clark is here to stay. And whether her peers like it or not, she’s changing the game—one assist, one point, and one record-breaking vote at a time.
play video:
