R’a’c’i’s’t Cop Tasers Black Ex-judge at His Home—Ring Cam Caught Everything and Leads to $7.2M Lawsuit
.
.
.
EX-JUDGE TASED ON HIS OWN PORCH: Ring Camera Bombshell Ignites $7.2 Million Civil Rights Lawsuit
By Staff Reporter
A quiet suburban evening turned into a flashpoint in America’s ongoing debate over policing, race, and accountability when a former Black judge was tased on the front steps of his own home — an incident captured in chilling detail by a Ring doorbell camera. Now, the explosive footage sits at the center of a $7.2 million federal civil rights lawsuit that is sending shockwaves through the local justice system.
The lawsuit, filed this week in U.S. District Court, alleges excessive force, racial profiling, unlawful detention, and violation of constitutional rights. Attorneys for the former judge say the video evidence leaves little room for ambiguity. The police department, however, insists its officers acted appropriately under what they describe as a “rapidly evolving situation.”
At stake is not only a multimillion-dollar claim but also the credibility of a department already under scrutiny.
A Knock at the Door Turns Violent
According to court filings, the incident occurred just after 8:30 p.m. on a mild spring evening in the judge’s residential neighborhood. Police had reportedly been responding to a vague “suspicious person” call from a neighbor who described “a man lingering” near the property line.
That man, the lawsuit says, was 62-year-old retired Judge Malcolm Turner (name used in court documents), standing on his own front porch while speaking on the phone with his sister.
The Ring footage — now widely circulated on social media — shows two uniformed officers approaching the front walkway. Judge Turner appears confused but calm, asking, “Can I help you, officers?” before setting his phone down.
Within seconds, the exchange escalates.
One officer demands identification. Turner responds that he is on his own property and does not believe he has committed a crime. The conversation grows tense. The officers insist he place his hands behind his back. Turner questions the basis for detention.
Then, without visible physical aggression from Turner, one officer deploys a Taser.
The judge collapses instantly onto the brick steps.
The entire sequence — from initial greeting to electrical discharge — unfolds in under 90 seconds.
“A Constitutional Breakdown”
Turner’s attorneys describe the incident as “a constitutional breakdown caught in high definition.”
“This is not a case of a violent suspect resisting arrest,” said civil rights attorney Daniel Whitaker during a press conference. “This is a retired jurist standing on his own property, asking basic questions about his rights, and being electrically incapacitated for it.”
Whitaker argues that the officers had no probable cause to detain Turner, much less use force. He further alleges that the neighbor’s call was based on racial assumptions rather than observable criminal activity.
The complaint states that Turner suffered a concussion from striking the steps, muscle damage from the Taser discharge, and ongoing emotional distress. Medical records included in the filing document hospital treatment that same evening.
“This was humiliation, physical trauma, and a violation of dignity,” Whitaker added. “All in front of a camera. All in front of his own home.”
The Police Response
The police department has declined to comment on pending litigation but released a short statement acknowledging the incident.
“Officers responded to a call regarding suspicious activity. During the encounter, the individual became noncompliant. Officers utilized a Taser to gain compliance. An internal review is ongoing.”
Body camera footage from the officers has not yet been publicly released. The department has confirmed that both officers have been placed on administrative leave pending investigation.
Law enforcement advocates caution against drawing conclusions from partial video clips.
“Doorbell cameras don’t always capture the full context,” said a spokesperson for the local Fraternal Order of Police. “Officers are often making split-second decisions under uncertain conditions.”
Still, critics argue that the video’s clarity undermines claims of ambiguity.
A Community Erupts
Within hours of the video’s release, community activists organized a candlelight vigil outside Turner’s home. Civil rights leaders have called for federal oversight and an independent investigation.
“Imagine serving your community for decades as a judge,” said local pastor Rev. Angela Morris. “Then being treated like a criminal on your own doorstep. This isn’t just about one man. It’s about trust.”
Protesters carried signs reading “Know Your Rights” and “Justice for Judge Turner.” Some called for the officers’ termination and criminal charges.
The city’s mayor issued a statement urging calm but acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations.
“We are committed to transparency and fairness,” the mayor said. “No one is above the law — including those sworn to enforce it.”
The Legal Stakes
The $7.2 million lawsuit includes claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the federal statute that allows individuals to sue government officials for civil rights violations.
Legal experts say the case could hinge on whether the officers had reasonable suspicion to detain Turner and whether the use of a Taser was objectively reasonable under the circumstances.
“The Supreme Court’s standard is ‘objective reasonableness,’” explained constitutional law professor Erica Langford. “The question is whether a reasonable officer would have believed force was necessary. Video evidence can be extremely persuasive in those determinations.”
If the case proceeds to trial, the Ring footage may become central evidence.
Settlements in similar excessive force cases have ranged from hundreds of thousands to multi-million-dollar payouts, depending on injury severity and public pressure.
A Broader Pattern?
Turner’s attorneys argue the case reflects broader systemic issues.
They point to department data showing that Black residents are disproportionately stopped and searched relative to their population percentage.
Police leadership disputes any suggestion of racial bias.
“Our officers serve all residents equally,” a department spokesperson said in a previous public report on use-of-force statistics.
Still, civil rights advocates argue that incidents like this reinforce perceptions of unequal treatment.
“When someone who spent his life interpreting the Constitution is tased for asserting it, that sends a message,” said attorney Whitaker.
The Human Toll
Judge Turner has largely avoided public appearances since the incident. In a written statement released through counsel, he described feeling “shocked, disoriented, and betrayed.”
“I have presided over cases involving allegations of excessive force,” Turner wrote. “Never did I imagine I would experience it firsthand.”
Friends describe him as measured and reserved — a man who spent decades upholding the rule of law.
“He believed deeply in institutions,” said longtime colleague Robert Hayes. “That’s why this cuts so deep.”
Technology as Witness
Ring cameras and other home surveillance devices have increasingly played pivotal roles in police accountability cases.
In this instance, the angle appears unobstructed, capturing audio and video of the entire interaction.
Legal analysts note that such footage can shift the balance in civil rights litigation.
“Historically, these cases were often ‘he said, she said,’” Professor Langford noted. “Video evidence can either corroborate or contradict officer testimony. It changes the calculus.”
However, courts also caution against interpreting footage without context, as video perspective can influence perception.
What Comes Next
The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as court-mandated reforms within the department.
A preliminary hearing is expected later this summer. Discovery could include officer training records, internal disciplinary history, and use-of-force statistics.
City officials have not indicated whether settlement talks are underway.
Meanwhile, the internal affairs investigation continues. If policy violations are found, the officers could face termination or other disciplinary action.
Criminal charges remain a possibility, though prosecutors have not announced any review at this time.
A Defining Moment
Cases like this often transcend the individuals involved. They become symbols — for reform advocates, for police supporters, for communities grappling with mistrust.
For some, the footage represents a stark example of disproportionate force. For others, it underscores the complexity of law enforcement in an era of heightened scrutiny.
What is certain is that a single knock at the door, a split-second decision, and a burst of electricity have ignited a legal and cultural battle that may reverberate far beyond one neighborhood.
The courts will ultimately determine liability. But the public has already rendered its own verdict in the court of viral opinion.
And at the center of it all stands a former judge — once the arbiter of justice — now seeking it for himself.
