WOKE Joy Taylor TRIGGERED By Caitlin Clark Popularity, CREDITS Angel Reese for HER SUCCESS!
.
.
.
Joy Taylor’s Take on Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese: Race, Rivalry, and the Changing Face of Women’s Basketball
In the rapidly evolving world of women’s basketball, few rivalries have captured the public’s imagination like that of Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese. Their on-court battles, competitive fire, and contrasting personalities have fueled debates across sports media, social platforms, and living rooms nationwide. But as the discourse around these athletes intensifies, so too does the conversation about race, representation, and the double standards that often shape how female athletes—especially Black women—are perceived.
Recently, sports commentator Joy Taylor ignited fresh controversy with her candid remarks on a podcast, suggesting that much of the backlash against Angel Reese stemmed from discomfort among white male fans at seeing a confident, unapologetic Black woman challenge Caitlin Clark, a player who has quickly become the face of women’s basketball. Taylor’s comments, and the heated responses they provoked, reveal just how charged the intersection of sports, race, and gender remains in America.
The Moment That Changed Everything
To understand the current debate, it’s important to revisit the moment that brought the Clark-Reese rivalry into the national spotlight. During the 2023 NCAA Women’s Basketball Championship game, Angel Reese, then a star forward for LSU, famously taunted Iowa’s Caitlin Clark with the “you can’t see me” hand gesture and pointed to her ring finger, signaling LSU’s impending victory.
For some, it was a display of competitive fire—a Magic Johnson vs. Larry Bird moment for the women’s game. For others, it was unsportsmanlike, even “ghetto,” as some critics labeled it. What was undeniable, however, was the way the moment split public opinion, with many observers noting a racial undertone to the outrage directed at Reese.
Joy Taylor, reflecting on the incident, argued that the backlash revealed deeper issues. “It upset white men to watch this strong, winning, unapologetic Black woman be in Caitlin’s face, in their savior’s face,” Taylor said. “They still cling to it.” Taylor’s assertion—that race and gender played a significant role in how fans responded to Reese’s actions—sparked a wave of both support and criticism.
The Double Standard in Sports
Taylor’s comments touch on a longstanding debate in sports: are Black athletes, especially women, judged more harshly for displays of confidence and bravado than their white counterparts? The evidence, many argue, is hard to ignore.
When Caitlin Clark herself made similar gestures earlier in the tournament, she was largely praised for her swagger and competitiveness. But when Angel Reese did the same, she was widely condemned. Critics like Taylor see this as a clear double standard—one that reflects broader societal biases.
Yet not everyone agrees with Taylor’s framing. Some listeners, including other podcast hosts, pushed back, arguing that the issue wasn’t about race, but about the context and the individuals involved. “She somehow thinks that white men—she didn’t say white women—were upset that this Black girl is all in Caitlin Clark’s face. That’s just one of the dumbest things ever,” one commentator said. “Nobody’s mad at Angel Reese because she’s Black. Angel Reese isn’t the one making the headlines in the WNBA now—Caitlin Clark is.”
Credit Where It’s Due?
One of the more controversial aspects of Taylor’s take was her insistence that Caitlin Clark’s meteoric rise would not have been possible without the rivalry with Angel Reese. “We would not be talking about Caitlin Clark the way that we do if it wasn’t for that moment with Angel Reese,” Taylor argued. “I will die on this hill.”
Supporters of this view see the Reese-Clark rivalry as pivotal, drawing much-needed attention to women’s basketball and creating storylines that attract fans. As Taylor put it, “You need villains, you need heroes, you need to sell the fight.” For the WNBA, which has long struggled for mainstream relevance, the drama and personalities of its stars are a crucial part of its growth.
But critics counter that Clark’s popularity is about more than a single rivalry. Her record-setting performances, long-range shooting, and poise under pressure have made her a household name. “Caitlin Clark has made the WNBA, in my personal opinion,” another podcast host said. “Nobody was watching these girls like that before. But then you watch what Caitlin Clark is able to do… That’s why she’s so prominent.”
The Physicality and the Spotlight
As Clark transitioned from college to the WNBA, the spotlight only grew brighter—and so did the scrutiny. Some fans and commentators have noted that Clark seems to be taking more physical punishment than other rookies, with hard fouls and aggressive defense becoming routine. Is this a sign that the league is “sending a message” to the new star, or simply the reality of professional sports?
The debate has even touched on the style of play in the WNBA. “The WNBA is very physical and it’s always been that way,” one commentator noted. “There’s fights all the time. There’s just new fans to the WNBA and they aren’t used to watching this. They have this protector thing over Caitlin.” Others argue that Clark is targeted not because of her race, but because she’s the biggest draw in the league—a rookie with unprecedented hype, endorsements, and media attention.
Attitude, Skill, and the Making of a Star
Much of the discussion comes down to the personalities and attitudes of the two stars. Caitlin Clark, despite the criticism and hard fouls, has largely shrugged off the drama. “This is basketball,” she told reporters after one particularly rough game. “It was a hard foul. I’m good. We’re good.”
Angel Reese, on the other hand, has sometimes been more vocal in her frustration, calling out what she sees as unfair treatment or double standards. For her supporters, this is a sign of authenticity and courage. For her detractors, it’s evidence of a lack of sportsmanship.
The contrast between the two has only fueled the rivalry. “Caitlin talks, as she should,” one host said. “She’s not walking around here humble or something, and she shouldn’t be. When she gets on the podium, she’s like, ‘This is basketball. It was a hard foul. I don’t care about none of that.’ She shoots her villain’s bail. Angel Reese, on the other hand, gets up there and complains and points the finger.”
The Bigger Picture: Race, Gender, and Representation
At its core, the debate over Clark and Reese is about more than just basketball. It’s about who gets to be celebrated for their confidence and who gets labeled as arrogant or “ghetto.” It’s about the ways in which Black women are policed for their behavior, and the ways in which white athletes are sometimes given the benefit of the doubt.
For Joy Taylor and those who agree with her, the conversation is a necessary one. “We can’t ignore the fact that Black women in sports are judged differently,” she said. “We need to talk about it, even if it makes people uncomfortable.”
Others worry that injecting race into every discussion risks overshadowing the real achievements of the athletes themselves. “Let’s not make everything about race,” one critic argued. “Caitlin Clark is successful because she’s talented and works hard. Angel Reese is successful in her own right. Let’s celebrate both.”
Moving Forward: What’s Next for the WNBA?
Regardless of where one stands on the debate, there’s no denying that the Clark-Reese rivalry—and the conversations it has sparked—have been good for women’s basketball. Ratings are up, merchandise is flying off the shelves, and young girls across the country have new heroes to look up to.
The WNBA, for its part, seems eager to embrace the drama. Rivalries, after all, are the lifeblood of sports. They create storylines, draw in fans, and elevate the game. As more eyes turn to the league, the hope is that the conversation will shift from controversy to celebration—from focusing on what divides the players to what unites them: their passion, skill, and determination.
Conclusion: More Than a Game
The debate over Joy Taylor’s remarks, and the broader discussion about Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese, is a reminder that sports are never just about the final score. They reflect the culture, values, and tensions of the society in which they’re played.
For some, Taylor’s comments were a necessary call to confront uncomfortable truths about race and gender in sports. For others, they were an unnecessary injection of identity politics into what should be a celebration of athletic achievement.
But perhaps the real lesson is that both can be true. We can celebrate Caitlin Clark’s brilliance and acknowledge the challenges faced by Angel Reese. We can cheer for our favorites while demanding fairness and respect for all athletes. And we can recognize that, in the end, the greatest rivalries are those that push everyone—players and fans alike—to be better, both on and off the court.
As the WNBA continues to grow, one thing is clear: the world is watching. And that, more than anything, is a victory for women’s sports.
play video:
