Woke Team USA Curler Dealt SHOCKING BLOW After HUMILIATING Himself on LIVE TV!
Milan, Italy – The 2026 Winter Olympics, which was meant to be a platform for athletic excellence and global unity, has turned into a political battleground once again. This time, it’s not due to unexpected upsets or remarkable performances on the slopes, but because of a series of political rants from American athletes. The latest controversy stems from a Team USA curler who chose to use his platform to bash U.S. law enforcement and voice his discontent with the nation’s policies — all while representing the country in front of millions of viewers worldwide.
While the world was watching, anticipating world-class athletic performances, this curler’s shocking comments about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the current political climate in the U.S. left many viewers stunned. Rather than focusing on his sport and the pride of representing the U.S., this athlete turned his press conference into a tirade against the very system that allows him to compete on the international stage.
.
.
.

The Controversial Comments: Curler’s Political Rant About ICE
The incident began with Rich Roonin, a 54-year-old curler from Minnesota, who made headlines for using his time in front of reporters not to discuss his curling strategy or Olympic dreams, but to criticize the actions of ICE agents in his home state. Roonin, who claims to be a lawyer, was questioned by reporters, but instead of sticking to the topic at hand, he veered off into a rant about immigration enforcement.
Roonin, visibly emotional, said, “We’d be remiss if we didn’t at least mention what’s going on in Minnesota, and what a tough time it’s been for everybody.” He continued, “What’s happening in Minnesota is wrong. There’s no shades of gray. It’s clear.” His comments were directed at ICE operations in his home state and the removal of criminal illegal immigrants. But it wasn’t just an isolated comment about a policy; Roonin’s remarks were filled with political rhetoric, expressing frustration with the U.S. law enforcement system and framing the situation as a human rights issue.
While Roonin mentioned that he loved representing the U.S. and playing for Team USA, many saw his criticism of ICE as hypocritical. After all, he was participating in the Olympics as part of Team USA — a country that allowed him to compete and achieve his dreams. Yet, instead of focusing on his performance, he chose to make his political stance clear on the global stage.
The Backlash: A National Outcry
Social media erupted following Roonin’s comments, with fans and critics alike expressing their disbelief. “This isn’t the place for politics,” one viewer commented. “The Olympics are supposed to unite us through sport, not divide us with political agendas.” Others were equally vocal, stating, “If you don’t want to represent America and its values, maybe it’s time to step off the Olympic team and leave the uniform behind.”
The backlash wasn’t limited to fans. A number of political commentators and public figures voiced their displeasure with Roonin’s remarks. “If you are going to represent the United States, you should be proud to do so,” one critic wrote. “The Olympic Games are about showcasing your country’s excellence, not about airing your grievances with its laws.”
While some defended Roonin’s right to express his views, many felt that this was not the time or place. “You’re here to represent the U.S. in a global competition, not to use it as a platform for political protest,” one commenter added.
Mike Eruzione’s Response: A True American Icon Speaks Out
The most powerful response came from Mike Eruzione, the captain of the U.S. Men’s Hockey Team that delivered the iconic “Miracle on Ice” victory against the Soviet Union in 1980. Eruzione, known for his patriotism and leadership, didn’t hold back in his condemnation of Roonin’s comments.
Eruzione took to social media, writing, “If you’re representing the U.S., you should wear that flag with pride. If you can’t do that, then don’t wear it at all.” He continued, “These athletes are not proud to be Americans. They’re too busy pushing personal agendas instead of representing our country with honor.”
For many, Eruzione’s words echoed the sentiment that representing Team USA should be about national pride, not political protest. “You’re wearing the American flag,” Eruzione added, “and when you criticize the country that gave you the opportunity to compete, it’s a slap in the face to every American who supports you.”
The Growing Trend of Political Activism in Sports
Roonin’s comments are part of a growing trend of athletes using their platforms to make political statements during the Olympics. From kneeling during the national anthem to making public statements about race, gender, and immigration, athletes are increasingly turning the Olympic Games into a stage for personal political ideologies.
While some defend these athletes’ rights to speak out about social issues, many believe that the Olympics should remain a platform for showcasing athletic talent and national pride, not for airing political grievances. “The Olympics should be a place where nations unite, not divide,” said one political commentator. “We’re here to celebrate sports, not hear political rants.”
The Bigger Picture: A Divided America and the Role of Politics in Sports
Roonin’s remarks are part of a larger conversation about the role of politics in sports. From the NFL to the Olympics, athletes increasingly use their platforms to speak out on issues ranging from race relations to immigration. While this reflects the growing political polarization in America, it also raises the question: Should sports remain apolitical, or is it time for athletes to use their visibility to push for social change?
For many fans, the answer is simple: The Olympics should be about unity and competition, not personal political agendas. But for athletes like Roonin, Glenn, and others, the Olympics have become just another stage for activism. “You’re supposed to represent the country,” said one commentator, “not tear it down while you’re on the world stage.”
![]()
The Call for Accountability: Should Athletes Be Removed from Team USA?
Following the uproar caused by Roonin’s comments, many have called for accountability. “If you don’t want to represent America, then maybe you shouldn’t wear the Team USA uniform,” one fan wrote. “There are millions of people who would love the opportunity to represent this country, and you’re wasting it with your political rants.”
Some Americans have even gone so far as to demand that athletes like Roonin and others who use the Olympics as a platform for protest be removed from the team. “If you’re not proud to represent the U.S., then leave,” one user wrote. “We don’t need athletes who can’t appreciate the honor of wearing the American flag.”
The Olympics: A Time for Unity and National Pride
The Olympics have always been about more than just the medals. They are about uniting nations through sport, celebrating the best athletes in the world, and coming together to showcase the ideals of competition, respect, and national pride. But when athletes choose to politicize the Games, it undermines the very spirit of the event.
As we saw in 2026, the line between sports and politics has become increasingly blurred. The question now is: Will the Olympics return to their roots as a platform for national pride and athletic excellence, or will they continue to be a stage for political activism?
The Backlash Continues: The Growing Discontent Among Fans
As the controversy surrounding Roonin’s comments continues to unfold, many fans are left feeling disillusioned. The Olympics, once a time for unity and pride, have become increasingly divisive, with athletes using their platforms to push personal political agendas rather than focusing on their athletic performance.
“For many fans, the Olympics should be about celebrating the success of their country on the world stage,” said one frustrated viewer. “We shouldn’t have to listen to political speeches. We’re here to watch the athletes compete, not to hear their personal grievances.”
Conclusion: A Time for Reflection
The 2026 Winter Olympics were supposed to be a time for Team USA to shine, to show the world what American athletes are capable of. Instead, the Games have become a platform for political protests and divisive rhetoric. Whether it’s Rich Roonin’s comments about ICE or Amber Glenn’s political agenda, the Olympics have lost something in the process.
As the Games continue, it remains to be seen whether this trend of political activism will continue, or whether the true spirit of the Olympics — one of unity, competition, and national pride — will be restored. One thing is certain: The fallout from these controversial moments will likely echo long after the final medal has been awarded. The Olympics, once a place of pride and unity, may now be forever changed by the political agendas of a few athletes who chose to use the global stage to air their grievances.