Racist Cop Stops Black Judge at Gas Station for “Driving a Luxury SUV”— $13.8 Million Lawsuit Follow
.
.
The Judge and the Wrongful Stop
The quiet buzz of the overhead lights in the gas station parking lot echoed in the night air as Judge Nathaniel Briggs stepped out of his car. It was just another evening. He had been at the courthouse late, finishing up some paperwork, when he decided to stop by the local gas station to refuel before heading home. There was nothing unusual about the moment, nothing out of the ordinary. Briggs was simply a man doing his job, like any other.
At 53, Briggs was a well-respected judge with a reputation for being fair and composed. His colleagues admired him for his temperament, his ability to remain calm in high-pressure situations, and his unwavering dedication to the law. But on this evening, none of that mattered.
As Briggs filled his car—a luxury Rolls Royce worth half a million dollars—he didn’t notice the patrol car cruising slowly past the pumps. Officer Mark Reick, behind the wheel, was on his usual patrol along Highway 19. The area had seen a recent uptick in criminal activity, or so it had been reported. The luxury vehicles passing through, especially in this less affluent part of town, often caught his attention.
Reick, a 32-year-old officer known for his aggressive “proactive policing” style, was quick to make assumptions based on appearances. He had a reputation for stopping drivers who didn’t seem to “belong” in the neighborhoods they were passing through or driving vehicles that didn’t fit their presumed social status. This time, as he drove by, his eyes immediately locked onto the black Rolls Royce parked at pump 4.
Reick’s posture shifted as his eyes narrowed. His instincts told him something wasn’t right. It didn’t matter that the car was perfectly parked, or that the man filling the tank had the calm, deliberate movements of someone going about their routine. To Officer Reick, the mere presence of a luxury vehicle in this area was enough to warrant suspicion.
Without a second thought, Reick turned his cruiser sharply into the parking lot, blocking the front of the Rolls Royce with his patrol car. The sudden movement made Judge Briggs glance up, his eyebrows raised slightly in confusion, but he didn’t show fear. He was simply puzzled by the unexpected intrusion.
Reick stepped out of his car with confidence, the kind of confidence that suggested he was already convinced he was about to catch someone in the act. He didn’t introduce himself or ask a simple question. No, instead, he immediately fixated on the vehicle.
“Sir, step away from the vehicle,” Reick ordered, his voice firm, almost commanding.
Briggs blinked, surprised by the abruptness, but remained composed. “Is there a problem, officer?”
Instead of answering, Reick circled the Rolls Royce, running his hand lightly across the hood as though checking for stolen property. Briggs, noticing the officer’s strange behavior, crossed his arms in confusion but didn’t move. Reick continued to inspect the vehicle, looking for anything that might raise suspicion.
“I’m going to need you to keep your hands where I can see them,” Reick said, his voice growing louder now.
Briggs exhaled calmly through his nose, sensing the tension building. “This vehicle, officer?” he asked, pointing to his car, genuinely confused.
“We’ve had reports of a vehicle matching this description involved in multiple thefts,” Reick stated, though his voice lacked conviction.
Briggs knew that what the officer was saying didn’t add up. He had owned this car for three years, paid for and registered in his name. He had all the documentation to prove it, but the officer’s tone suggested otherwise.
“Who filed that report?” Briggs asked, his calm demeanor barely masking the disbelief he felt.
But instead of answering, Reick placed his hand on the SUV’s door handle as if expecting it to unlock on its own. Briggs had locked the vehicle out of habit, but the officer tried again, tugging at the handle.
“Unlock it,” Reick demanded.
“No,” Briggs replied firmly. “You don’t have the right to search my vehicle.”
The air grew thick with tension. A gas station attendant peeked out from the convenience store window, sensing that something was wrong. Briggs saw the worker’s concerned gaze, and for a brief moment, hoped the presence of witnesses would calm the situation. But instead, the officer seemed to grow more irritated.
“I’m going to need your identification now,” Reick ordered.
Briggs, ever the professional, didn’t raise his voice. He simply nodded and reached carefully for his wallet. “I’m not refusing. I’m cooperating, but I’d appreciate knowing why this stop is happening,” he said calmly, holding his hands up in a non-threatening gesture.
Reick, however, was becoming more agitated. “This vehicle was reported stolen 15 minutes ago,” he repeated, as though he had convinced himself of the story he was trying to build.
Briggs’ eyes narrowed. “I’ve been at the courthouse all evening,” he replied, “and I’ve been here for the last 30 minutes. How could my vehicle be reported stolen?”
Reick didn’t answer. He continued to circle the Rolls Royce, tapping the roof with his hand, trying to appear as if he were searching for evidence that wasn’t there. “Where did you get this car?” he asked again, this time the question dripping with suspicion, as though he believed the man standing before him couldn’t possibly own such an expensive vehicle.
Briggs, now understanding that this wasn’t a routine stop but a clear case of racial profiling, stood his ground. He knew the officer had no legal right to search his car without probable cause. But it was becoming evident that Reick wasn’t interested in facts. He was more interested in asserting his authority.
“Do you have probable cause to search my vehicle?” Briggs asked, his voice calm but firm.
Reick smirked, his response coming quickly. “Yeah, you’re standing next to a car that doesn’t belong to you.”
At this point, Briggs realized that the officer wasn’t interested in truth, but in controlling the narrative. Reick wasn’t acting out of genuine suspicion but out of a desire to escalate the situation.
As the officer continued his increasingly aggressive stance, Briggs calmly but firmly asked for a supervisor. He wasn’t going to let this go any further, not without someone who could bring reason to the situation.
Reick, not backing down, radioed for backup. “Unit 12 requesting backup. We have a possibly stolen vehicle at Highway 19 gas stop,” he said, framing the situation as though he was dealing with a high-risk crime rather than a routine check of a legally owned car.
Within minutes, a second cruiser arrived, and Officer Jansen stepped out, assessing the situation quickly. He didn’t immediately take sides, but his presence only served to increase the tension. The two officers, now standing together, looked at the luxury SUV, then back at Judge Briggs. It was clear that neither officer knew who he was, but their assumptions were clear.
“I provided identification,” Briggs said, turning to the second officer, “I offered paperwork. I refused an unlawful search.”
Jansen seemed hesitant, but Reick was quick to act, doubling down on his earlier accusations. “We need you detained until we verify ownership,” Reick insisted, his voice growing more insistent.
“No grounds,” Briggs responded, shaking his head. “You can’t detain me.”
With the arrival of backup, the scene became even more charged. Onlookers began to gather, their phones out, capturing every moment of the escalating situation.
“Sir, step away from the car,” Officer Jansen ordered, though it was unclear whether he was speaking to Briggs or Reick.
The tension was palpable. And then, in a moment of clarity, Judge Nathaniel Briggs did what he had done thousands of times in his courtroom—he stood firm. He wasn’t just a judge by title; he was a judge in this moment because he knew what was right. And he knew that the officer’s actions were wrong.
“Officer, you are escalating a situation that didn’t need escalation,” Briggs said, his voice steady and calm.
“I didn’t escalate anything,” Reick snapped. “You’re making a mistake.”
The tension reached a breaking point as Reick reached for his handcuffs. Briggs didn’t flinch. He simply said, “You are making a mistake.”
The body cam footage, combined with recordings from bystanders, captured the entire exchange. And when the second officer, Jansen, began to look at the judge’s ID, everything changed.
For the first time, Reick’s confidence faltered. The judge’s ID was unmistakable. He wasn’t just any driver. He was Judge Nathaniel Briggs, a well-respected superior court judge.
The situation immediately shifted. Jansen took a step back, his expression now one of recognition. Reick, now frozen in place, realized his mistake. There was no stolen vehicle, no justification for his actions.
The crowd stood in stunned silence as the truth unfolded. Reick, realizing the gravity of the situation, avoided eye contact with the judge. Briggs, with the same calm authority he had always possessed, said simply, “I expect to leave without further harassment.”
The officers, now fully aware of their mistake, allowed the judge to leave. The footage from the gas station went viral within hours, sparking outrage across the community.
Judge Nathaniel Briggs filed a lawsuit—$13.8 million for racial profiling, unlawful detention, and emotional distress. The evidence, captured on camera, was undeniable.
Within days, Officer Reick was placed on administrative leave, and the department launched an investigation. The case became a symbol of the need for accountability, not just in law enforcement but in society as a whole.
For Briggs, the moment had passed. He returned to his courtroom, his head held high. He wasn’t looking for a fight. He was simply seeking respect—and in the end, that was exactly what he had earned.
