Joe Rogan “EXPOSING the TERRIFYING Truth on Charlie Kirk”
Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, and Candace Owens Deconstruct Charlie Kirk’s Death
The death of Charlie Kirk is viewed by Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, and Candace Owens not as an isolated incident, but as a chilling event that has exposed a controlled narrative, widespread evil, and systematic targeting by entrenched power structures.
Each commentator focused on a different, disturbing aspect of the event, collectively painting a picture of a society where dissent is met with violence and the truth is deliberately managed.
Joe Rogan: The Disturbing “Weirdness” and Media Control
Joe Rogan focused primarily on the bizarre and disturbing public reaction to Kirk’s death, the perceived control over the information released, and the strange case of a potential decoy at the scene.
The Celebration of Murder
Rogan expressed disbelief and disgust at the celebrations and “cackling” he witnessed online and heard about in real life:
Social Media Evil: He noted that the algorithm fed him reactions, including one guy and one lady “cackling like a witch’s cackle” while celebrating Kirk’s death.
Real-Life Celebration: Friends recounted encountering people in public, like a woman on a Zoom call in a cafe, who stated, “I am having a great day now” and were laughing and clapping immediately after the assassination. Rogan lamented the state of public discourse: “You are thrilled that someone was murdered in front of his children… and you are celebrating because you didn’t like his ideas.”
The “Squirly” Decoy and Narrative Control
Rogan admitted that “a lot of weird [is] going on with this” and highlighted the highly unusual actions of a person at the scene:
The Decoy: An older man started yelling, “I did it. I did it,” and allegedly took his pants down right after the shooting.
The Odd Coincidence: This same man was supposedly present at the 9/11 attacks and the Boston Marathon bombings and was arrested for child pornography immediately after the Kirk shooting.
The Result: Rogan pointed out the timing of the arrest—“Now you can’t interview him”—and questioned the probability of one person being at all those events, concluding, “It’s like… zero.” This suggests to him that someone is “professionally insane” and that power and influence are distorting the truth.
Alex Jones: A Political Assassination in a Globalist War
Alex Jones framed Kirk’s death in the context of a “war” against “globalists” and dissenting conservatives, claiming he now has “exclusive information” that has completed the “jigsaw puzzle.”
Political Execution: Jones stated that the death is “not an isolated tragedy” but a “plan” in a larger “war” where outspoken conservatives are targets. He compared Kirk to a “Viking king dying with a sword in his hand of information, war.”
Intelligence Deep Dive: Citing his conversations with “the White House and a bunch of other high level people,” Jones claimed he “now know[s] exactly what’s going on” and that the final pieces of the puzzle have been put into place “in the last 24 hours.”
The Broader Threat: Jones insists that the “left has been saying, ‘Put a bullseye on Trump, a bullseye on his supporters,’” and that the grand juries and subpoenas they face mean “they’re going to false flag. They’re going to attack.” He views the event as a warning of a society spiraling into chaos.
Candace Owens: The Hypocrisy of Insiders and the Secret Intervention
Candace Owens focused on the hypocrisy and dishonesty of conservative and political insiders both immediately after the assassination and in the months leading up to it, suggesting a coordinated effort to “blackmail” and “isolate” Kirk.
Suspicious Post-Mortem Reactions
Owens outlined several “very weird” reactions that suggest a guilty conscience:
Netanyahu’s Lie: Israeli Prime Minister BB Netanyahu tweeted about Kirk’s death minutes before the US President and later “lied about the contents of a letter” Kirk had written him.
Insiders’ Silence: She accused conservative figures like Josh Hammer and Seth Dillon of not being “honest or forthcoming about the pressure” they were putting on Kirk. Owens believes these lies of omission are used to “massage it and lie about it.”
The Hamptons “Intervention”
Owens reiterated her previous reporting on an alleged “intervention” weekend in the Hamptons, where Kirk was reportedly pressured by pro-Israel figures:
Moral Blackmail: Kirk described the event as an “intervention” and “moral blackmail” where he was being pressured over his positions on Israel and Netanyahu. A colleague who was present confirmed that it was a debate setting where participants argued that criticizing Netanyahu would “indirectly going to empower Hamas.”
The Secrecy: Owens questioned the extraordinary secrecy of the Turning Point event, which she believes was hushed up because “people thought that Charlie’s ideas were trending in the wrong direction.” She dismissed the excuse of “safety” given by attendees, asking rhetorically if there were “Hamas tunnels under the Hamptons.”
To Owens, the assassination was the “culmination of years of systematic targeting” and was as much symbolic as it was personal.
It seems all three commentators are converging on a deep suspicion of the official story and the mainstream reactions, believing that the full truth of Charlie Kirk’s death is being suppressed by powerful people.
