WNBA Players Union Snubs Caitlin Clark in Latest Merchandise Rollout: Angel Reese & 8 Others Featured Instead
A new controversy is brewing in the WNBA after the league’s Players Association unveiled its latest official merchandise collection—noticeably omitting rookie sensation Caitlin Clark. Instead, the rollout spotlighted Angel Reese and eight other prominent players, sparking widespread debate among fans, analysts, and even fellow athletes.
The Merchandise Rollout That Raised Eyebrows
The WNBA Players Association (WNBPA) announced its much-anticipated summer merchandise campaign this week, featuring limited-edition jerseys, apparel, and accessories highlighting some of the league’s brightest stars. Among those front and center were Chicago Sky’s Angel Reese, New York Liberty’s Sabrina Ionescu, Las Vegas Aces’ A’ja Wilson, and several others. However, fans immediately noticed the absence of Indiana Fever rookie Caitlin Clark, arguably the most talked-about player in women’s basketball this year.
The move left many fans puzzled, especially given Clark’s record-breaking jersey sales, soaring popularity, and the increased viewership she’s brought to the league. Social media lit up with the hashtag #ClarkSnub, with supporters questioning why the WNBPA would leave out the rookie who has arguably done more to grow the league’s audience than any other player this season.
Union’s Official Explanation
In a statement released via social media, the WNBPA explained, “This campaign was planned months in advance to celebrate a diverse group of established and emerging stars. We are proud of all our members and look forward to future opportunities to spotlight every player’s unique contribution to the game.”
However, the explanation did little to quell the backlash. Critics argued that, given Clark’s impact and her historic rookie campaign, the union should have made adjustments to include her in the rollout. “Plans change. Caitlin Clark is the biggest story in sports right now,” tweeted ESPN’s Ramona Shelburne. “It’s a missed opportunity for the league and the players.”
Angel Reese and Others Respond
Angel Reese, who was prominently featured in the campaign, addressed the controversy during a postgame interview. “I support every woman in this league, including Caitlin,” Reese said. “We’re all trying to grow the game. The more attention we get, the better for everyone. I hope fans keep supporting all of us.”
Other players featured in the rollout, including A’ja Wilson and Sabrina Ionescu, echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing unity and the importance of celebrating all players’ achievements.
Fans and Analysts React
The omission of Clark has divided the WNBA fanbase. Some argue that the league and union should focus on promoting a wide range of talent, not just the most popular names. Others insist that Clark’s star power is too significant to ignore. “She’s moving the needle like no one else,” said The Athletic’s Chantel Jennings. “Leaving her out feels like a statement, intentional or not.”
Meanwhile, merchandise sales for the featured players have reportedly surged, but so have calls for a separate Caitlin Clark line. “People want to buy Caitlin Clark gear,” one fan wrote on Instagram. “Why make it harder for them?”
Broader Implications for the WNBA
The controversy highlights ongoing tensions within the league as it balances tradition, equality, and the realities of star-driven marketing. Some see the snub as a reflection of the league’s desire to avoid over-reliance on a single player, while others view it as a missed opportunity to capitalize on Clark’s unprecedented popularity.
As the WNBA continues to capture new audiences, the debate over how to best promote its stars—old and new—will likely persist. For now, the “Clark snub” has only added fuel to the conversation about the league’s future and the importance of recognizing the contributions of all its players.
