NEW EVIDENCE LEAKED! Camilla ACCUSED In Diana’s Mysterious Death — William Declares Her GUILTY!
Explosive New Evidence Reignites Questions Over Princess Diana’s Death as Prince William Launches Secret Inquiry
.
.
.
London / Paris — More than 25 years after the death of Princess Diana, evidence long believed buried has resurfaced—dragging the British royal family into one of its most unsettling internal crises in decades.
An unmarked envelope containing a damaged USB drive, a sealed handwritten letter, and traces of unexplained financial transfers has drawn Prince William into a clandestine investigation that sources say has shaken the monarchy to its core. What began as anonymous material has now evolved into a tightly guarded inquiry involving senior royals, archival officials, former security personnel, and confidential financial records dating back to August 1997.
At the heart of the matter is a chilling audio recording allegedly captured in Paris just hours before Diana’s fatal car crash. The voice—female, controlled, and unmistakably authoritative—issues a brief but disturbing instruction: “Keep her at the hotel for another 30 minutes. The system isn’t ready.”
For Prince William, the implication was impossible to ignore.
A File That Would Not Stay Buried
Sources close to Kensington Palace confirm that the USB drive was delivered without a return address and contained a single audio file titled Paris_1997_Final – 72 Hours. Alongside it was a blurred photograph appearing to show a woman closely associated with Queen Camilla’s former private circle.
Former royal security officer David Ree, who once protected Diana, later identified the voice as “disturbingly familiar,” stating it resembled someone present at Camilla’s private gatherings in the late 1990s. While he stopped short of naming the speaker, the recognition was enough to raise immediate alarm.
William, advisers say, initially told no one—not King Charles, not Catherine, Princess of Wales, and not Prince Harry—fearing both political fallout and premature media exposure.
Diana’s Sealed Letter Surfaces
The investigation took a dramatic turn when palace archivists uncovered a sealed envelope dated May 1997, bearing Diana’s signature and personal seal. The letter, never previously opened, contained a precautionary message requesting that specific security rosters, driver lists, and French contacts be released “in the event of any unusual mishap.”
The language stunned officials. This was not sentiment—it was preparation.
Despite strict protocol, copies of the documents were quietly preserved after Queen Camilla’s office reportedly requested full access to the materials. Several insiders confirmed that original pages—most notably a contract cover sheet—were missing, with evidence suggesting recent removal rather than archival decay.
The Money Trail
Parallel to the archival discovery, Princess Anne initiated a discreet audit into royal financial transfers from 1997. The inquiry uncovered a £2.4 million transfer made three days before Diana’s death to a Luxembourg-based entity named Lucentia Global, described in internal memos with the phrase “personnel adjustment – optimal timing.”
Financial analysts consulted by the royal household noted that the language strongly resembled security coordination terminology, not routine accounting. Crucially, the contract’s identifying page—showing the authorizing party—was missing.
Princess Anne reportedly described the omission as “not clerical, but deliberate.”
Clarence House Call Raises New Alarm
Perhaps the most sensitive revelation emerged from an internal communications log retained by former security staff. The record indicated a 42-second phone call from Clarence House to the Paris security supervisor at 22:16 on the night Diana was delayed at the Ritz Hotel—precisely aligning with the audio recording’s timestamp.
Although the official digital log was later deleted during a system overhaul, a printed backup survived.
When confronted during a closed-door meeting at Kensington Palace, Queen Camilla categorically denied issuing any such order or having knowledge of it. She acknowledged the call may have originated from Clarence House but emphasized that many individuals had access to the line at the time.
Notably, she denied responsibility—but did not deny the call itself.
An Inquiry Without a Name
The matter escalated to a confidential Royal Security Council hearing at Buckingham Palace, where evidence including the audio recording, Diana’s letter, financial transfers, and altered security rosters was formally presented.
After two days of testimony, the council concluded that no single individual could be directly named as responsible for the delay in Diana’s movements. However, the final report acknowledged a “pattern of opaque decision-making within the security framework that created significant vulnerabilities.”
A restricted appendix—circulated only among senior officials—referenced the Clarence House call, the disappearance of a key private secretary from the period, and evidence of manipulated duty rosters.
Within hours, reports emerged that the former aide linked to the blurred photograph had quietly relocated abroad years earlier.
Public Fallout and Quiet Withdrawals
Shortly after the hearing, Queen Camilla announced a temporary withdrawal from public duties on medical advice. Buckingham Palace declined to comment further.
Media reaction was sharply divided. Some outlets declared the matter closed, citing the absence of formal accusations. Others questioned why so many records were altered, removed, or erased—long after Diana’s death.
Online, comparisons between the recorded voice and Camilla’s past speeches went viral, fueling renewed public debate.
William’s Final Decision
In the aftermath, Prince William announced the creation of the Wales Legacy Trust, placing all of Diana’s personal documents, artifacts, and intellectual property under independent protection—effectively removing them from internal palace control.
Standing at Diana’s grave at Althorp, William was seen placing a single white rose on the water. To those nearby, he reportedly said only: “I tried. I went as far as I could.”
The inquiry is now officially closed. No arrests were made. No charges filed.
Yet for many, the silence feels heavier than before.
As Britain continues to debate whether Diana’s death was a tragic accident or something more carefully shaped, one truth remains undeniable: questions long suppressed have resurfaced—and the cost of burying them has only grown with time.
