😡 Chicago Principal DEFENDS Teacher Who Made Disturbing Charlie Kirk Gesture — Completely Ignores Her Outrageous Behavior!

A Chicago public school principal is under fire after issuing a letter to parents that framed a teacher as the target of threats—while omitting any reference to the teacher’s viral gesture widely interpreted as mocking conservative influencer Charlie Kirk’s assassination last month.

The incident centers on Lucy Martinez, a teacher at Nathan Hale Elementary School, who was recorded during a No Kings protest over the weekend putting a finger to her neck and pretending to pull a trigger. The gesture, captured on video and shared widely across social media, triggered outrage and demands for disciplinary action.

The Letter: Safety Emphasized, Behavior Unaddressed

Nathan Hale Elementary School Principal Dawn Iles-Gomez sent a letter to the broader school community that, according to The Post, focused exclusively on the safety concerns stemming from online threats. In the message, Iles-Gomez said the school had been made aware of “social media posts with language that resemble a potential threat to a staff member.”

“We take all potential threats extremely seriously to ensure the safety of our school community,” the letter stated, noting that the Chicago Police Department (CPD) and the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) Office of Safety and Security had been notified. The principal added that CPD was “currently investigating this situation further” and that the school would receive “additional safety support” at the start and end of the day “out of an abundance of caution.”

Notably absent from the letter was any acknowledgment of Martinez’s recorded gesture or whether she faced disciplinary action. The omission sparked further criticism from commentators and parents who argued the school was protecting the teacher while refusing to address her conduct.

Backlash and Calls for Accountability

Reaction was swift and polarized. Media host Megyn Kelly criticized Martinez on her SiriusXM show, saying, “Her fat a– needs to be fired,” reflecting the anger seen across conservative media circles. Former West Virginia state lawmaker Derrick Evans—who was convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot—accused the school of victimizing Martinez while ignoring “her vile behavior mocking Charlie Kirk.”

Actor Braeden Sorbo also weighed in, posting that “Lucy Martinez, a K-8 teacher mimicking Charlie Kirk’s death at the No Kings protest,” contrasted with broader public focus on a recent Young Republicans group chat scandal, suggesting an uneven moral outrage landscape.

Unverified claims circulated online that Martinez had been fired. However, the principal’s letter indicates she remains employed at Nathan Hale Elementary. The school did not respond to requests for comment, and CPD was approached for comment as well.

Context: A Gesture with High-Stakes Implications

The controversy emerges amid heightened tensions over political violence, free expression, and professional conduct for educators. The video’s widespread interpretation—as a pantomime of Kirk’s assassination—turns a protest gesture into a flashpoint for broader debates about political polarization and acceptable public behavior for those in positions of trust.

For public schools, incidents like this pose complex dilemmas:
– How should administrators balance immediate safety concerns with transparent acknowledgment of staff conduct?
– What standards should guide discipline when off-campus behavior undermines community trust?
– How can schools apply consistent policies when social media inflates outrage and accelerates demands for action?

The School’s Narrow Focus on Threats

Iles-Gomez’s letter signals an administrative emphasis on imminent safety threats rather than reputational harm or disciplinary transparency. While schools are obligated to protect staff and students when credible threats arise, critics argue that failing to address the underlying behavior erodes confidence in leadership and leaves families without clarity on values and consequences.

The principal’s decision to notify CPD and increase safety measures aligns with protocol for threat assessment. Yet the absence of any reference to Martinez’s actions may be perceived as avoidance, particularly given CPS’s codes of conduct that typically address staff behavior impacting school communities, even if off-campus.

What Comes Next

With CPD reportedly investigating threats and CPS safety officials looped in, the immediate focus remains on de-escalation and campus security. Whether CPS initiates a formal review of Martinez’s conduct—or whether Nathan Hale Elementary provides further communication to families—will likely determine whether the controversy continues to intensify.

Key unresolved questions include:
– Has CPS opened an internal investigation into Martinez’s conduct?
– Does the teacher’s gesture violate CPS policies regarding professional standards and public behavior?
– Will the school provide a follow-up statement addressing both safety and accountability?

Until those questions are answered, the incident will continue to serve as a case study in how schools communicate under pressure—caught between safeguarding their community and confronting staff actions that inflame public trust.