Jasmine Crockett SHUTS DOWN Trump Supporter on Live TV—He Didn’t See It Coming
In a heated congressional hearing that quickly made waves online, Representative Jasmine Crockett delivered a pointed and memorable takedown of Tony Bobulinski, the GOP’s star witness in the Biden impeachment inquiry. The exchange not only exposed the shaky credibility of the investigation’s witnesses but also laid bare the political theater behind the ongoing inquiry.
Setting the Stage: The Impeachment Inquiry’s Star Witness
Tony Bobulinski, touted by Republicans as a key whistleblower, appeared before Congress to testify about alleged wrongdoing by President Biden. However, from the outset, Representative Crockett made it clear she had serious doubts about Bobulinski’s credibility, referencing previous closed-door exchanges and reminding him—and the public—that his reputation preceded him.
“I definitely have always had issues with your credibility as I know that you are very well aware of.”
Crockett’s command of the hearing was evident as she swiftly put Bobulinski in his place, insisting he only respond when asked and reclaiming her time whenever he tried to interrupt.
Unraveling the Web: Trump Connections and Credibility Issues
One of Crockett’s most effective moves was entering into the record evidence that Bobulinski’s legal representation was paid by Save America PAC, Donald Trump’s political action committee. This raised immediate questions about impartiality and motivation.
“At this point in time, I’d ask unanimous consent to enter into the record a document indicating that the law firm representing Tony Bobulinski was paid $10,000 as recently as January of this year by the Save America PAC, which you may recognize as Donald Trump’s PAC.”
Crockett didn’t stop there. She compared the hearing to a bad episode of “The Apprentice,” suggesting that some witnesses were less interested in serving the truth and more interested in auditioning for future roles in Trump’s political orbit.
The List of Liars: Crockett’s Relentless Cross-Examination
Crockett then delivered a devastating rundown of all the people Bobulinski had called liars—everyone from the Wall Street Journal to Cassidy Hutchinson, the FBI, and multiple individuals involved in the inquiry. The implication was clear: if everyone is lying except Bobulinski, perhaps it’s his own credibility that should be questioned.
“You called the Wall Street Journal liars. You called Cassidy Hutchinson a liar. You called the FBI a liar. You called Rob Walker a liar. You called James Gilliar a liar. You called Hunter Biden a liar. You called Jim Biden a liar. And just today, you added to your list—you called my colleague, Congressman Mr. Goldman, a liar as well.”
When Bobulinski tried to interject, Crockett instantly shut him down, reinforcing her authority and the seriousness of the proceedings.
The Company You Keep: Trump Associates and Legal Troubles
The hearing also highlighted the dubious backgrounds of many Trump associates. Crockett’s questioning revealed that the majority’s case relied on testimony from individuals currently in federal prison or found liable for fraud, defamation, and sexual assault—many with direct ties to Trump.
“We know that your company is the company of somebody who’s been found liable of fraud, as well as defamation, as well as sexual assault, and for whatever reason can’t pay his bills at this point in time.”
Her questioning of another witness, Mr. Parnas, confirmed that Trump had numerous associates who had been found guilty of crimes, further undermining the credibility of the impeachment inquiry.
The Giuliani Factor: The Foundation of the Inquiry
Crockett reminded the committee and viewers that the entire impeachment effort was built on a debunked document concocted by Rudy Giuliani. She pointed out that attempts to subpoena Giuliani and obtain his cell phone were blocked, suggesting that the majority was less interested in facts and more focused on spectacle.
“This whole thing is based upon something that Giuliani came up with… Like they don’t want the facts.”
Crockett’s Reality Check: Political Theater Exposed
In summary, Jasmine Crockett’s handling of Bobulinski and the other witnesses was more than just a viral moment. It was a reality check for Congress and the American public. She exposed the inquiry as political theater, propped up by witnesses with questionable ties to Trump and no consistent proof of wrongdoing by President Biden.
Bobulinski, who arrived hoping to be seen as a credible whistleblower, left looking more like an actor auditioning for a role in Trump’s comeback season.
Conclusion: Accountability, Not Auditions
Jasmine Crockett’s performance in Congress was a masterclass in accountability, fact-checking, and refusing to be distracted by partisan spectacle. Her relentless questioning and command of the hearing reminded everyone that credibility matters—and that the truth should never take a back seat to political ambition.
