Michael Jordan admits he would win more rings with Scottie Pippen than he would with Magic Johnson: “Scottie could do more than Magic”
The image of Michael Jordan and Magic Johnson donning the same NBA jersey never made it past the imagination. Though the two icons shared the court during the 1992 Barcelona Olympics as members of the Dream Team, that version of unity never translated to an NBA setting.
It was a summer of spectacle, not a glimpse into what could have been. The Olympic stage wasn’t built for power struggles or locker room politics; it was built for dominance and gold medals. In the NBA, though, where egos collide and chemistry is currency, things play out differently.
Playing with Magic
Charles Oakley, who played for the Chicago Bulls alongside Jordan from 1985 to 1988, revealed that the six-time NBA champion only had his eye for one partner — and it wasn’t Johnson.
“He said he’d win more rings with Scottie [Pippen],” Oakley said. “Scottie could do more than Magic. He always praised Scottie.”
It cracks open a conversation that’s less about slighting Johnson and more about honoring the unique synergy Jordan shared with Scottie Pippen. The sentiment underscores a deeper truth about championship basketball — talent may win games, but cohesion and complementary skill sets win titles.
By the time Jordan hit his championship stride in the early ’90s, he had already witnessed what happened when talent failed to translate into rings. Prior to Pippen’s arrival in 1987, Jordan was an unstoppable scorer on a middling team, pouring in points without a viable second star.
It wasn’t until Scottie evolved into a versatile force — guarding multiple positions, running the floor, facilitating offense — that the Bulls dynasty began to take shape. Between 1991 and 1998, Jordan and Pippen secured six titles, never losing in the NBA Finals. That stat alone remains untouchable in league history.
Oakley’s quote aligns with what insiders have known for years, that Jordan valued not just greatness, but functionality. In Pippen, he found a teammate who didn’t need the ball to dominate, didn’t demand the spotlight and could defend the best perimeter player on the opposing team night after night.
Pip averaged 5.2 assists per game during his prime — all while leading the Bulls in steals and often rebounding like a forward. He was the perfect balance to Jordan’s relentless scoring and competitive fire.
Big personalities
Johnson, for all his brilliance, was a different kind of teammate. The five-time champion and three-time MVP redefined the point guard position with his 6-foot-9 frame and court vision that blurred the line between instinct and sorcery.
But Magic was also a vocal floor general, a player whose presence shaped the identity of every team he touched. For the Showtime Los Angeles Lakers, he was the system. In Chicago, there was already one.
MJ’s competitiveness didn’t allow much breathing room. Even during the Dream Team stint, reports surfaced of a competitive edge that boiled over into scrimmages, including the now-legendary intra-squad battle where Jordan and Johnson went head-to-head with bragging rights on the line.
Michael famously led his squad back from a deficit, with Magic later conceding that he could see the league was officially Jordan’s. It was symbolic, but it was also telling. Two alphas don’t share a crown easily.
What made the Jordan-Pippen pairing unique wasn’t just their skill sets, but how they enhanced each other without getting in each other’s way.
While Jordan led the league in scoring for 10 seasons, Pippen emerged as the NBA’s most adaptable second star, never needing validation in the form of headlines. In fact, from 1991 to 1993 and again from 1996 to 1998, the Bulls posted an average of 61 wins per season — success fueled by balance, not just brilliance.
In contrast, Johnson’s Lakers were built on the Showtime philosophy, a blur of fast breaks, glitz and passing flair. His dominance came with a smile, but also with structural control. Had he and Jordan ever worn the same jersey in the NBA, the question wouldn’t have been about talent, but hierarchy. And Jordan, for all his reverence for Johnson, was never going to play the passenger.
The NBA has seen multiple examples of stacked talent failing to materialize into rings. The Kobe Bryant-Shaquille O’Neal feud in the early 2000s cost the Lakers what could have easily been a five- or six-title dynasty.
The LeBron James-Dwyane Wade-Chris Bosh trio needed time to understand spacing and sacrifice. Even Kevin Durant’s joining Steph Curry’s Warriors in 2016 required a cultural adjustment period.
Jordan, sharp enough to read the landscape, was chasing rings. And for that, Pippen was the ideal running mate.
