Sabrina Carpenter SLAMS Trump: “Don’t You EVER Use My Music for Your Inhumane Agenda!

Pop star Sabrina Carpenter has forcefully condemned the Trump administration after discovering that her hit song “Juno” was used in a White House video promoting ICE raids on immigrants in America. The video, which circulated widely on social media, synced Carpenter’s music to a montage that began with footage from a protest against ICE and then cut to scenes of agents handcuffing individuals.

Carpenter, known for her candid social media presence and advocacy for human rights, did not hold back in her response. She called the video “evil and disgusting,” making it clear that she wanted no association with the administration’s immigration policies.

“Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda,” Carpenter wrote, directly addressing former President Donald Trump and his team.

The Controversial Video

The White House video in question was designed to highlight the administration’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants. By pairing Carpenter’s emotionally charged song with images of ICE agents in action, the video appeared to co-opt her art for political messaging—a move that sparked immediate backlash from fans and activists alike.

Social media erupted as Carpenter’s statement went viral, with many praising her for taking a stand and refusing to let her work be used to justify policies she opposes.

Artists Speak Out Against Political Misuse

Carpenter joins a growing list of musicians and celebrities who have publicly objected to their work being used in political contexts without their consent. From Bruce Springsteen to Rihanna, artists have repeatedly called out politicians for using their songs at rallies or in promotional materials, especially when the underlying message conflicts with their personal values.

For Carpenter, the issue was not just about copyright—it was about the moral implications of aligning her music with what she described as an “inhumane agenda.”

The Power of Protest and Public Response

The incident highlights the ongoing tension between political messaging and artistic integrity. Carpenter’s swift and unequivocal response drew attention to the broader debate over immigration policy and the treatment of immigrants in America. It also underscored the influence that celebrities can wield in shaping public discourse, especially when their work is appropriated for causes they do not support.

Fans rallied behind Carpenter, amplifying her message and demanding accountability from those responsible for the video. Many called for the immediate removal of the clip and urged other artists to speak out against similar misuse.

Conclusion

Sabrina Carpenter’s refusal to allow her music to be used for political purposes she finds reprehensible sends a clear message: Art should not be weaponized to promote inhumane policies. As debates over immigration and human rights continue, her stance serves as a reminder of the power artists have to defend their values and influence the public conversation.