Candace Owens: “Charlie Kirk Predicted His Assassination 24 Hours Before Shooting!
In a revelation that has shaken conservative circles and reignited fierce debate across political and media platforms, commentator Candace Owens has claimed that Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, predicted his own assassination just one day before he was killed.
During a recent broadcast, Owens shared that three individuals — including a prominent Turning Point USA donor — allegedly received messages or heard directly from Kirk expressing fear for his life. “The very day before Charlie Kirk died,” Owens said, “he told these people, ‘I think they’re going to kill me.’”
The chilling statement has fueled an online storm, with many questioning what Kirk knew — and who he believed was targeting him.
“He Knew Something Was Coming”
According to Owens, Kirk had confided these concerns privately, and she only decided to go public after verifying multiple off-record accounts. “He had not expressed that to me,” she explained, “but three people told me the same thing — and two have written communications from him.”
Owens said she hopes those who were close to Kirk will now come forward publicly to help uncover what really happened on the day of his death, which she referred to as “9/10.”
Her revelation comes just days after Owens released screenshots of private text messages reportedly sent by Kirk 48 hours before his assassination. In those texts, Kirk complained that several of his donors — many of whom were Jewish — had withdrawn their financial support following his criticism of pro-Israel lobbying efforts. “I cannot and will not be bullied like this,” Kirk allegedly wrote. “That leaves me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”
Within two days, he was dead.
The Silence from Turning Point USA
Owens accused Turning Point USA (TPUSA) of attempting to downplay or even cover up Kirk’s messages. She claimed the organization “tried to pretend it didn’t exist until she produced the receipts.”
A senior TPUSA official later acknowledged that the leaked screenshots were authentic, confirming they had originated from a private group chat. “That was a text grab that I had shared with people,” he admitted during a live broadcast, appearing visibly uneasy.
Owens and others in the conservative sphere have since accused TPUSA leadership of trying to protect powerful donors rather than pursue truth or transparency. “They look excited to be caught,” one commentator mocked. “Thank God somebody proved me a liar — and I was trying to cover this up.”
The “They” Question
The most haunting aspect of Owens’s revelation, however, lies in one unresolved question: Who exactly did Charlie Kirk believe was going to kill him?
“I think I know who ‘they’ are,” one host said during the discussion, before quickly ruling out obvious political or international adversaries. “It wasn’t Venezuela, Iran, or Russia,” he said. “And I’m almost 100% sure it wasn’t the so-called trans lover story they tried to float.”
While Owens has refrained from naming anyone directly, online speculation has exploded — some pointing fingers toward shadowy political interests, others hinting at financial or ideological motives connected to Israel.
The theory has gained traction partly because Kirk, known for his strong pro-Israel stance throughout most of his career, had publicly clashed with several prominent donors in the weeks leading up to his death. Commentators noted that his sudden reversal on the issue was both surprising and potentially dangerous.
“He had become inconvenient for them,” one analyst said. “Charlie Kirk was the most popular conservative figure under 30 — more influential among young conservatives than Trump himself. And the moment he turned against the establishment, he feared for his life.”
Divide, Conquer, and the Oligarchy
Owens also used her broadcast to issue a broader warning about what she called the “divide and conquer” tactics of the American elite.
“They don’t want people on the left and right to realize they actually agree on many things,” she said. “They want you to keep thinking the problem is your neighbor — not the oligarchs who run the country.”
Her remarks echoed a sentiment that has resonated across ideological lines: that political polarization in America benefits those in power while keeping ordinary citizens distracted and divided.
“We all agree on ending wars, protecting free speech, investing in our own country,” one host added. “But the more they can keep us divided, the more they can keep us conquered.”
A Dangerous Road Ahead
Since the broadcast, social media has been flooded with theories, screenshots, and impassioned debates under hashtags like #WhoKilledCharlieKirk and #CandaceOwensBombshell. Some users have praised Owens for her courage in speaking out, while others have accused her of exploiting tragedy for attention.
Meanwhile, TPUSA and Kirk’s family have declined to comment publicly on Owens’s statements, saying only that “the investigation remains ongoing.”
Still, the implications are staggering. If Kirk truly believed he was being hunted — and if those fears were rooted in real threats — it could point to a far deeper and darker network of political manipulation than anyone imagined.
As Owens concluded in her broadcast, “I’ve found truths people tried to bury before — and if I found what they didn’t want me to find last time, I’ll find who killed Charlie Kirk, too.”
Whether this is the start of a genuine investigation or just another round of political theater, one thing is certain: Charlie Kirk’s final words have ignited a storm that shows no signs of dying down.
