Lefties Losing It: Bad Bunny’s ‘depraved’ performance labelled ‘wholesome’ by WaPo

It’s official. Bad Bunny—the reggaeton icon—has rocked the Super Bowl halftime stage, but not in the way you might think. What was supposed to be a thrilling musical moment for the masses has instead sparked a fiery cultural battle. From The View’s polarizing defenders to an outpouring of social media backlash, Bad Bunny’s performance has sparked outrage like no other. What should have been a celebration of cultural diversity has turned into a full-blown culture war.

Fans were disappointed, critics were appalled, and the mainstream media — led by outlets like the Washington Post — are boldly claiming that Bad Bunny’s controversial halftime performance represents the pinnacle of wholesome family entertainment. But what do the facts say?

From “risky” lyrics to hypersexualized performances, Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl debut has left a trail of destruction in its wake, with cultural commentators, fans, and even some of Hollywood’s elite questioning whether the NFL crossed the line by celebrating a performance some are calling depraved. The most shocking part? Some left-wing media outlets are hailing the spectacle as “wholesome”—while millions of fans call it out as a moral failure. Here’s why this may go down as one of the most controversial halftime shows ever.

The ‘Wholesome’ Half-Time Performance?

In the world of live televised events, the Super Bowl halftime show is a sacred institution. It’s the golden stage where the biggest names in music show the world why they’re at the top of their game. And for years, this meant big-name stars performing iconic hits, pushing boundaries but never quite crossing them. But 2026 was different. Bad Bunny, a Puerto Rican reggaeton artist known for his explicit lyrics and controversial persona, performed during the most watched televised event of the year.

On the surface, it was an opportunity to showcase Latin culture to an American audience. But as the halftime show unfolded, it quickly became clear that the performance was not just about music, but a full-throttle attempt at virtue signaling that many have labeled vulgar and disrespectful. Some critics even went as far as saying it was nothing short of a “moral disaster.”

Yet, incredibly, outlets like the Washington Post had the gall to call Bad Bunny’s performance an example of “wholesome traditional family values.” Yes, you read that right: the Washington Post labeled a performance known for its explicit content, heavy on suggestive dance moves and controversial lyrics, as family-friendly. Critics were left reeling, asking: “What planet are these people living on?”

The Critics Speak Out: From ‘Wholesome’ to ‘Woke’

It didn’t take long for the backlash to mount. After the performance, social media was ablaze with outrage. “What was that?” was the common refrain as fans complained that the halftime show was more about sexual performance than musical artistry. Sunny Holston, a host from The View, in a bizarre defense of the show, suggested that if you didn’t appreciate the performance, then it was simply because you didn’t “love Bad Bunny” — and, by extension, were probably racist.

Holston’s statements didn’t sit well with many viewers. In fact, they made things worse. Critics took to Twitter, calling her out for defending what they saw as a toxic display of cultural appropriation and degeneracy disguised as an innocent celebration. Holston doubled down, claiming that you didn’t need to speak Spanish to appreciate the joy, unity, and inclusivity of the performance. But what she didn’t seem to realize is that the vast majority of viewers couldn’t even understand what Bad Bunny was saying. Fans were left asking: How can we feel unity when we’re not even sure what’s being celebrated?

The Lyrics: Not So Family-Friendly

If you thought the visual spectacle of Bad Bunny’s performance was controversial, wait until you hear what the artist was actually singing. According to critics, many of the lyrics in Bad Bunny’s set weren’t just provocative — they were outright inappropriate for a family event. Songs like “TT Mapto” were translated, revealing lyrics about treating women like disposable objects, having multiple lovers, and celebrating promiscuity.

Here’s the kicker: Washington Post’s glowing review of the performance claimed that Bad Bunny’s halftime show demonstrated the “wholesome traditional family values” that should be celebrated by all Americans. Critics responded with utter disbelief, pointing out the double standard. They reminded the world that the NFL and Super Bowl had once been home to performances by artists like Prince, Michael Jackson, and Beyoncé, who were known for performances that were exciting, tasteful, and yes, family-friendly. How does one compare the elegance of a Michael Jackson halftime show to this?

Bad Bunny’s Impact and Media Manipulation

Despite the criticism, Bad Bunny’s performance wasn’t a total bust for everyone. Some left-wing commentators were quick to suggest that the real problem was simply that critics didn’t understand the modern landscape of American culture. Governor Andy Basher, a Kentucky Democrat, even weighed in, claiming that it’s his Christian faith that makes him endorse giving transgender minors access to gender-affirming treatments. He linked his argument to Bad Bunny’s performance, asserting that it was time to embrace “alternative lifestyles” without judgment.

Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets like the Washington Post continued to support the idea that Bad Bunny’s performance was a cultural milestone, equating the performance with uplifting values of diversity. But many saw this as an excuse to pander to leftist ideologies, making a clear distinction between virtue signaling and actual cultural significance. The public reaction revealed the truth: most viewers felt alienated by the celebration of a hypersexualized performance that had little to do with the heart of the Super Bowl.

The Unspoken Truth: The Hypocrisy of ‘Wholesome’ Wokery

The real issue here isn’t just Bad Bunny’s show — it’s the mainstream media’s warped definition of “wholesome” and the way it’s been used to defend every aspect of modern woke culture. Bad Bunny’s performative sexuality, provocative dancing, and explicit lyrics were glossed over as “progressive” by those looking to promote a certain political agenda. Meanwhile, critics — including comedian Alex Stein — pointed out that the mainstream media was too willing to praise the show while completely ignoring its problematic nature. The truth? They wanted to present “woke” ideology as a triumph, no matter how destructive the message was.

The Real Winner of Super Bowl LX: Turning Point USA

While the NFL may have handed the Super Bowl trophy to the Seahawks, the true winner of Super Bowl LX was an unlikely challenger: Turning Point USA. Kid Rock, the icon of conservative music, took to the stage at the Turning Point USA Halftime Show, delivering a performance that resonated with millions. Turning Point USA, a conservative organization, saw a massive surge in viewers, with numbers steadily climbing on platforms like YouTube and Rumble.

Meanwhile, Bad Bunny’s performance, despite being discussed endlessly, did not hit the mark for most fans. Whether it was the lack of engagement in the stadium, the negative online feedback, or the disastrous mainstream media defense, Bad Bunny’s performance didn’t quite live up to its legendary status.

Conclusion: A Performance That Will Be Remembered for All the Wrong Reasons

The fallout from Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance is just beginning. As mainstream outlets like the Washington Post continue to praise the performance as an act of “inclusivity”, the backlash against it only intensifies. The critics are vocal, and they’re not backing down.

Bad Bunny’s performance was a massive PR blunder for the NFL, one that will have cultural ramifications for years to come. Whether it was a cultural statement or just a poorly executed spectacle, one thing is clear: the Super Bowl halftime show will never be the same again.