You WON’T BELIEVE What Tulsi Gabbard Just EXPOSED About Adam Schiff – His Career is Over!
.
.
🚨 The Unraveling: Tulsi Gabbard DESTROYS Adam Schiff’s Career with Classified Evidence and Moral Authority
The Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, meant to confirm Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence (DNI), transformed into a shocking tribunal. Senator Adam Schiff, attempting to destroy her nomination by labeling her a “Russian asset,” made a catastrophic error.
Lieutenant Colonel Gabbard, a combat veteran with three war zone deployments, responded by pulling out a classified folder and systematically exposing years of Schiff’s alleged corruption, manipulation, and abuse of power, dismantling his credibility piece by piece for the entire nation to witness.
I. The Fatal Miscalculation: Schiff’s Accusation
The hearing had proceeded routinely until Senator Schiff, the former House Intelligence Committee Chairman, took the floor. He used his platform to deliver a devastating attack on Gabbard’s loyalty and judgment.
The “Russian Asset” Claim: Schiff accused Gabbard of “fundamental disqualifications,” citing her meeting with Syrian President Assad, her defense of Russian positions, and her criticisms of the U.S. intelligence community. He culminated his attack by leaning directly into the camera and declaring: “You are functioning as a Russian asset, and I cannot in good conscience vote to put someone with your record in charge of our nation’s intelligence apparatus.”
The accusation—leveled against a combat veteran still serving in the Army Reserve—was a political death sentence.
The Warrior’s Response: Tulsi Gabbard sat perfectly still for three seconds. When she finally spoke, her voice was steady as steel: “Senator Schiff, that’s a very serious accusation you’ve just made against a military officer who has served this country in combat zones for over two decades.”
She paused, reaching into her briefcase for a folder marked with FBI and Intelligence Community classification stamps.
“Since you want to question my loyalty to America in a public hearing, I think it’s appropriate that we discuss your conduct as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. The most disturbing intelligence I’ve reviewed doesn’t concern foreign adversaries. It concerns you.”
II. The FBI Whistleblower and the Leak Scandal
Gabbard immediately targeted Schiff’s alleged role in leaking classified information to damage President Donald Trump, a key component of his political persona.
The FBI 302 Report: Gabbard produced an FBI interview document (302 Report) from August 2017.
The Witness: The document detailed testimony from a Democratic staffer who worked on Schiff’s committee for over a decade—a whistleblower who confirmed that Schiff had allegedly called an all-staff meeting.
The Allegation: According to the FBI documentation, Schiff allegedly stated that the committee would “leak classified information… which was derogatory to President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.”
The Whistleblower’s View: When the intelligence officer expressed concern that leaking classified information would be illegal, others in the meeting allegedly responded: “We would not be caught leaking classified information.” The whistleblower later told the FBI that Schiff’s actions were “unethical and treasonous.”
Gabbard used the whistleblower’s testimony to flip the narrative entirely, asserting that Schiff, while posing as the protector of U.S. intelligence, had allegedly approved the leaking of genuine national security secrets for political gain.
III. The Weaponization of Intelligence: Mueller, Durham, and FISA
Gabbard then used the reports from Special Counsel Robert Mueller and Special Counsel John Durham—investigations Schiff had heavily promoted—to dismantle his credibility on the Russia collusion narrative.
The Collusion Lie: Gabbard compiled Schiff’s media appearances, showing 227 television appearances between 2017 and 2020 where he claimed to have seen “more than circumstantial evidence” of Trump-Russia collusion.
The Contradiction: She contrasted this with the final reports:
Mueller Report (2019): Concluded the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government.”
Durham Report (2023): Concluded the FBI investigation “should never have been opened in the first place, that it lacked proper predication.”
The Conclusion: Gabbard delivered the crushing logical verdict: “Senator, you cost the American taxpayers $32 million for the Mueller investigation… and it was all based on claims you made that were proven false by every serious investigation. Were you lying then, or are you lying now?”
FISA Abuse Defense: Gabbard moved to the abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), showing that Schiff defended the FBI’s surveillance of Carter Page, a Trump campaign associate.
The IG Report: She cited the Inspector General (IG) report, which found 17 significant errors and omissions in the FISA applications, errors that favored more intrusive surveillance and suppressed exculpatory evidence.
Political Cover: Gabbard pointed out that while Congressman Devin Nunes raised concerns, Schiff released a memo claiming the surveillance was “proper and justified,” providing political cover for the flawed process. “You saw what you wanted to see. You defended the surveillance because it supported your political narrative.”
IV. The Impeachment Fabrication and Mortgage Fraud
The systematic destruction continued as Gabbard exposed Schiff’s conduct during the first Trump impeachment and introduced a potentially criminal liability.
The Parody Call: Gabbard focused on the moment Schiff served as the lead impeachment manager and read a fabricated summary of President Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Zelensky, presenting it as “the essence” of what Trump said.
The Deception: “You made it up. You fabricated a conversation between two world leaders and presented it to Congress as if it was real.” Gabbard argued that in the military, falsifying intelligence reports would lead to a court-martial. Schiff’s action, while protected by constitutional immunity, was no different.
The Financial Nail in the Coffin: Gabbard concluded with a recent, politically unrelated finding from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).
The Allegation: The FHFA referred Schiff to the DOJ for allegedly falsifying bank documents and property records related to a home in Potomac, Maryland, between 2003 and 2019. The allegation was that he misrepresented the property as his primary residence to obtain favorable mortgage terms—a federal crime known as mortgage fraud.
The Final Question: “Senator, I will be referring your conduct… to the appropriate authorities for review. Because in America, no one is above the law.”
V. The Collapse of Credibility and Systemic Reform
The hearing room exploded in chaos. Schiff’s practiced political composure was utterly shattered. He looked like he wanted the floor to swallow him whole.
Gabbard stood her ground, her military bearing commanding the room. “What have you sacrificed for this country, Senator? Your credibility, your integrity, your oath… You sacrificed American unity, American trust, and American security, all for political power.”
The Aftermath:
Confirmation: Tulsi Gabbard was confirmed as DNI, with five Democrats joining all Republicans in support. Schiff voted present.
Criminal Indictment: Three months later, the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office indicted Adam Schiff on three counts of mortgage fraud.
Systemic Change: DNI Gabbard implemented sweeping reforms across the Intelligence Community, establishing a new Inspector General position to investigate congressional intelligence leaks and overhauling FISA procedures.
Political Fallout: Schiff resigned from the Senate two years later after being convicted and sentenced to prison.
The Schiff Hearing fundamentally changed the relationship between Congress and the Intelligence Community. It served as a powerful lesson: when someone with unquestionable integrity has access to the truth, no amount of political power can survive the exposure.
.
