Brewery CEO DESTROYS Governor Of California After Moving $2 BILLION To Colorado!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TQtXTdYlZw
California’s Economic Suicide: The Anheuser-Busch Betrayal
On December 11, 2025, the state of California effectively signed the death warrant for one of its most historic manufacturing giants. The announcement that Anheuser-Busch would permanently terminate its Fairfield operations wasn’t just a business decision; it was a crime scene. We are witnessing the systematic governmental destruction of an entire industry, financed by the very taxpayers who are losing their jobs. The closure of the Fairfield facility, a 170-acre powerhouse that had churned out beer for the entire western coastline since 1976, is not a story about changing consumer tastes. It is a story about a state government that has become so hostile to commerce that it makes profitable operations mathematically impossible.
Consider the sheer insanity of the timeline. Just seventeen months prior to the closure announcement, Anheuser-Busch poured $7 million into the Fairfield plant. They updated assembly lines, modernized equipment, and committed to the future. No corporation spends that kind of capital on a facility they intend to abandon unless the ground beneath them shifts violently. And shift it did. California’s legislative machinery, fueled by a single-party supermajority, has created an environment where even a global beverage titan cannot survive. The state demands a 13.3% personal income tax and an 8.8% corporate tax, battling against jurisdictions like Texas, Florida, and Tennessee that charge zero. When you combine punitive taxation with a regulatory labyrinth of 518 distinct agencies, committees, and councils, you don’t get a business climate. You get a hostage situation.
Fairfield Mayor Katherine Moy didn’t mince words when she labeled California’s commercial atmosphere a “hostile dictatorship.” It is a scathing indictment coming from a local official watching her municipality perish because Sacramento refuses to cease suffocating enterprises. The statistics are horrifying. In 2024 alone, California eliminated 48 breweries while only 26 launched. The state is bleeding manufacturing capacity while the Governor’s office offers nothing but excuses about federal tariffs and economic uncertainty. They blame Donald Trump, they blame the weather, they blame everything except the mirror. But the executives leaving the state aren’t looking at federal tariffs; they are looking at a state government that treats them like an endless ATM while making it impossible to build, hire, or expand.
The human cost of this political malpractice is devastating. 238 careers ended. These were not gig-economy side hustles; these were solid, high-income manufacturing jobs with benefits. Mike Rogers, a 21-year veteran of the plant, is now facing unemployment just months before his planned retirement. He has a child in school and a mortgage to pay. The corporation offered transfers to Los Angeles, 400 miles south, but for families rooted in Solano County, that isn’t a lifeline; it is an eviction notice. Most employees rejected the transfer proposals, choosing joblessness in California over uprooting their lives. That is how toxic the situation has become. They would rather face the uncertainty of unemployment than move to a city where the cost of living is even more predatory.
The fallout extends far beyond the brewery gates. The local ecosystem is collapsing. For five decades, the Fairfield operation provided enormous quantities of spent grain to Central Valley dairy farmers—a protein-rich feed supply that was affordable and sustainable. With the brewery gone, that supply chain vanishes instantly. Farmers must now import feed from the Midwest, paying diesel premiums to haul it across the Rockies. That cost will be passed directly to you at the grocery store. Every gallon of milk and pound of meat in Northern California is about to get more expensive because Sacramento decided to drive out the manufacturer that provided the feed.
The City of Fairfield itself faces a financial catastrophe. The brewery was the city’s largest water customer, consuming two million gallons daily from Lake Berryessa. That single client accounted for 7% of the entire municipality’s water utilization. When that revenue disappears, the fixed costs of the infrastructure don’t vanish; they get redistributed to the surviving residents. Mayor Moy has warned that water rates could spike by 20% within twelve months. Citizens are looking at hundreds of dollars added to their yearly bills, not because they are using more water, but because they are paying for the vacant capacity left behind by a government-induced exodus.
This is part of a broader, accelerating trend of capital flight that is draining the lifeblood of the state. In 2024, California lost eight Fortune 500 headquarters. Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Tesla, Charles Schwab—the list reads like an obituary of American innovation. They all fled to Texas or Tennessee, taking billions in taxable income and thousands of jobs with them. San Francisco’s commercial real estate market is in freefall, with vacancy rates hitting unprecedented highs. Office buildings are selling for pennies on the dollar compared to their pre-pandemic values. Yet, the state administration persists in pretending that nothing is wrong, asserting that the economy is strong while the very people who built that economy are packing U-Hauls.
The future that Sacramento is establishing is one of dependency and inflation. With the Fairfield plant gone, Anheuser-Busch will shift production to its Los Angeles facility and out-of-state breweries. This means the beer you buy will travel three or four times the distance, incurring higher fuel costs and greater distribution risks. Industry experts forecast price surges of up to 20%. You will pay more for a product that used to be made in your backyard, simply because your elected officials decided that regulatory purity was more important than economic viability. The distribution network is already fracturing, with wholesalers facing delays and increased expenses that will inevitably land on the consumer’s tab.
As February 2026 approaches, the physical reality of this policy failure will become impossible to ignore. The 170-acre site on Busch Drive will go dark. The iconic Budweiser signage that welcomed motorists on Interstate 80 for fifty years will be extinguished. The Clydesdales that were a fixture of community celebrations will be gone. What remains is a void—a vacant industrial lot that serves as a monument to administrative failure. City Manager David Gassaway has warned that these specialized facilities are nearly impossible to repurpose, meaning the site will likely rot, dragging down surrounding property values and further depressing the local economy.
We are watching a state commit economic suicide in real-time. California possessed a premier manufacturing asset, a facility that won awards for its green practices and employed hundreds of its citizens. Instead of protecting it, the state crushed it under the weight of taxes and bureaucracy. The Anheuser-Busch closure is not an anomaly; it is the inevitable result of a “hostile dictatorship” that views business as an enemy to be conquered rather than a partner to be supported. Until the electorate wakes up and demands a government that understands the basic principles of economics, the exodus will continue, the prices will rise, and the golden state will continue to rust.
