Turning Point USA SLAMS Jimmy Kimmel’s Hollow Response to Charlie Kirk Smear: ‘A Liar Without Remorse
Jimmy Kimmel’s emotional response to the fallout from his controversial monologue has sparked intense backlash, particularly from conservative circles. Andrew Kolvet, a strategist for Turning Point USA and a close friend of Charlie Kirk, has publicly rebuked Kimmel, labeling him an “unrepentant liar” for his comments regarding Kirk’s assassination.
Kimmel faced significant criticism following his remarks that falsely linked Kirk’s alleged killer to the MAGA movement. His comments, made during a segment on his late-night show, drew outrage not only from Kirk’s supporters but also from political commentators and media outlets. In response to the backlash, Kimmel returned to the airwaves on Tuesday night, visibly emotional, asserting that he never intended to trivialize the tragedy surrounding Kirk’s death.
Kolvet, who serves as executive producer of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” condemned Kimmel’s justification for his remarks as insufficient. He expressed his frustration on social media, stating, “Jimmy, it’s simple,” and outlined the apology he believed Kimmel should have delivered: “I’m sorry for saying the shooter was MAGA. He was not. He was of the left. I apologize to the Kirk family for lying. Please accept my sincere apology. I will do better. I was wrong.”
Kolvet’s criticism extended beyond Kimmel’s comments. He accused the late-night host of exploiting a tragic event to further a political agenda, stating, “Kimmel is an unrepentant liar who tried to blame Charlie’s assassination on the part of the country that just spent the last two weeks praying and holding vigils.” He emphasized the importance of accountability, insisting that “liars admit they lied” for any hope of restoring trust.
Kimmel’s emotional plea did little to quell the outrage. Conservative commentators quickly took to social media, accusing him of evading responsibility for his statements. Jack Posobiec, a prominent conservative figure, characterized Kimmel’s display as a manipulation tactic, calling it a “DARVO playbook” strategy—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender.
The backlash continued to mount as other conservative voices joined in. Dana Loesch criticized Kimmel for failing to offer a genuine apology, stating, “No apology. He wasn’t making a joke. He outright lied about the killer because he hated the politics of the victim. Jimmy Kimmel can pound sand.” Similarly, Scott Jennings echoed this sentiment, asserting that Kimmel’s use of the phrase “MAGA gang” was intentional and misleading.
The controversy escalated to the point where Disney, which owns ABC, sidelined Kimmel for nearly a week following the incident. The political ramifications reached the upper echelons of the company, prompting discussions about the impact of Kimmel’s remarks on the network’s reputation.
As the fallout continues, Kimmel’s situation serves as a stark reminder of the heightened sensitivities surrounding political discourse in America. The backlash from Turning Point USA and other conservative commentators illustrates the deep divisions in public opinion, particularly regarding media figures and their responsibilities in reporting and commentary.
Kimmel’s emotional return to the screen, while intended to convey sincerity, has instead highlighted the challenges of navigating complex political narratives. As the debate over accountability and truth in media persists, both Kimmel and his critics are likely to remain at the forefront of this contentious dialogue.
