Letitia James Sued for Election Retaliation | FRAUD
.
.
ELECTION FRAUD BOMBSHELL: Letitia James Sued for Alleged Political Retaliation Against Citizen Auditors
NEW YORK, N.Y. – New York Attorney General Letitia James is facing a significant civil rights lawsuit, accusing her office and the State Board of Elections of engaging in a conspiracy to suppress election oversight, weaponize state power, and cover up evidence of potential voter fraud.
The 52-page complaint, filed by the civic group NY Citizens Audit (NYCA), claims that when the group presented data anomalies from the state’s official voter database, the response was not transparency, but a coordinated campaign of retaliation and intimidation, including an alleged criminal probe launched under the Ku Klux Klan Act.
THE CORE ALLEGATIONS: DATA ANOMALIES AND ELECTION MISCONDUCT
NYCA states that its comprehensive research into New York’s official statewide voter database, NYS Voter, uncovered massive irregularities that they claim point to systemic election misconduct.
1. The Jaw-Dropping Numbers
The lawsuit lists specific, high-stakes numbers identified within the state’s official records:
Duplicate IDs: Over 1.5 million duplicate voter IDs in the NYS Voter database.
Phantom Votes: Roughly 436,000 more votes cast than corresponding voters on record between and .
Impossible Voters: Records of voters allegedly registered before birth or over the age of 114.
Total Invalid Records: A claim of 29 million “facially invalid registration records” across the state.
NYCA emphasizes that these irregularities, which they classify as appearing to be “felony misconduct” under U.S. Department of Justice guidelines, demand a comprehensive, independent, and certified audit of the entire New York election process.
2. Destruction of Records
The group also claims that some election officials admitted that voter records were overwritten after the 2020 election, which would constitute a direct violation of federal law requiring election records to be preserved for months.
THE LAWSUIT: POLITICAL WEAPONIZATION OF STATE POWER
The central conflict of the lawsuit is the government’s response to the citizen auditors—alleged retaliation rather than investigation.
1. Retaliation vs. Transparency
NYCA claims that when they presented their findings to state officials, the response was to “brand the volunteers as misinformation spreaders.”
The Cease and Desist: Letitia James’ office allegedly sent a cease and desist letter to the group, accusing them of “impersonating election officials” and “intimidating voters.” This letter was front-page news across New York media before NYCA even received it, suggesting a coordinated media ambush.
The Ku Klux Klan Act Probe: The most severe allegation is that James’ office used the Ku Klux Klan Act (42 U.S.C. § 1985) to launch a criminal investigation against the citizen auditors, a move typically reserved for cases of racial violence or voter intimidation, to suggest that a group of retirees and data analysts asking questions were a “threat” to democracy.
2. The Constitutional Argument
The lawsuit is filed under the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, arguing that Letitia James and state officials violated the citizens’ rights to petition the government, speak freely, and receive equal protection under the law.
The Facade: NYCA argues that if citizens cannot petition their government about election integrity without being investigated as criminals, then “representative government is a facade.”
THE NATIONAL IMPLICATIONS: A LITMUS TEST
The NYCA lawsuit is framed as a national litmus test for political censorship and accountability.
Lawfare and Dissent: This case challenges what critics call “lawfare”—the use of state power to intimidate dissent. It questions how far elected officials, especially Democratic Attorneys General, can go in branding citizen auditors as “criminals” or “anti-democratic” simply for demanding transparency.
Mainstream Silence: The report notes the conspicuous silence of mainstream media outlets (e.g., The New York Times, CNN) regarding the lawsuit, suggesting the narrative that citizen auditors are criminals does not fit the preferred mainstream storyline.
The case, filed in the Northern District of New York, is poised to set a major precedent. If the court rules that Letitia James overstepped, it could redefine the line between government oversight and political censorship regarding election accountability.
Do you believe that state officials should have the right to criminally investigate citizen groups who raise concerns about voter data accuracy, even if those concerns are later proven incorrect?
.
play video:
