A’ja Wilson ROBBED! Angel Reese Wins BET Sportswoman of the Year! Did BET Watch The WNBA????!

.
.
.

A’ja Wilson Robbed? Angel Reese Wins BET Sportswoman of the Year Amid WNBA Controversy

Introduction: A Shocking Award Decision Sparks Outrage

The BET Awards have ignited a firestorm in the sports world by naming Angel Reese as the Sportswoman of the Year, a decision that has left many WNBA fans and commentators scratching their heads. With powerhouse players like A’ja Wilson, the reigning WNBA MVP, among the nominees, the choice of Reese—a rookie with modest stats and no major awards—has sparked accusations of agenda-driven decision-making and raised questions about whether BET even watches basketball. This article explores the controversy surrounding Reese’s win, the backlash from fans and analysts, and the broader implications for recognition in women’s sports.

The BET Awards Announcement: Angel Reese Takes the Crown

During the recent BET Awards, Angel Reese, the Chicago Sky rookie, was crowned Sportswoman of the Year, beating out a star-studded list of nominees that included A’ja Wilson, Clarissa Shields, Coco Gauff, Dawn Staley, Flo-Jo Johnson, JuJu Watkins, Sha’Carri Richardson, and Simone Biles. The announcement was met with immediate shock and disbelief from basketball fans, many of whom took to social media to express their outrage. “How is Angel Reese winning awards for being average at best?” one commenter quipped, while others labeled the decision a “joke” and questioned BET’s credibility in evaluating athletic achievement.

Reese, known for her college success at LSU and her polarizing presence in the WNBA, has had a rookie season marked by hustle and rebounding but plagued by inefficiency. Averaging around 9 points per game with a field goal percentage hovering near 30%, she plays for one of the league’s worst teams. Her win at the BET Awards, celebrated by Reese with a mix of gratitude and flair, has only intensified scrutiny over whether her selection was based on merit or something else entirely.

A’ja Wilson Snubbed: The Case for the WNBA MVP

At first glance, A’ja Wilson seemed the obvious choice for Sportswoman of the Year if the award were to go to a basketball player. As the reigning WNBA MVP and a dominant force for the Las Vegas Aces, Wilson has consistently proven herself as one of the league’s elite. Her stats, leadership, and impact on the court far outshine Reese’s current contributions. “There’s no way in hell Angel Reese should have even been nominated over A’ja Wilson,” one analyst argued. “If BET is watching basketball, how do they miss this?”

Fans echoed this sentiment, with many pointing out that other deserving Black athletes like Napheesa Collier weren’t even nominated. “A’ja Wilson got shafted,” a social media post read, while another called the decision “sickening.” The snub of Wilson, who has been a vocal advocate for the WNBA and a role model for aspiring athletes, has fueled speculation that BET prioritized popularity or cultural narratives over on-court performance. Wilson herself has remained silent on the matter, leaving fans and commentators to speak on her behalf.

Nominee List Sparks Further Debate

The full list of nominees for Sportswoman of the Year only deepened the controversy. Alongside Wilson, the list featured Olympic champions like Simone Biles and Sha’Carri Richardson, tennis prodigy Coco Gauff, and boxing star Clarissa Shields—athletes with undeniable achievements on a global stage. The inclusion of Angel Reese among such titans of sport raised eyebrows, with many questioning what specific accomplishments justified her nomination, let alone her win. “What has she done to win this award? Missing layups?” one critic sarcastically remarked.

Some fans pointed out Reese’s rebounding stats, often boosted by her own missed shots, as a dubious claim to fame. “Is this award for getting the most rebounds off her own misses?” another commenter joked. The consensus among detractors is clear: while Reese shows potential, her current performance in the WNBA does not warrant recognition over established stars like Wilson or other nominees with proven track records of excellence.

Accusations of Agenda-Driven Selection

The backlash to Reese’s win quickly evolved into broader accusations of an agenda at play. Critics argue that BET and certain media outlets are artificially elevating Reese to a level of stardom she hasn’t yet earned, possibly to align with cultural or social narratives rather than athletic merit. “This is part of the media agenda to put her in the same echelon as A’ja Wilson, which she’s not even close to,” one commentator stated. “It’s not fair to Angel either, because it puts a spotlight on her that she’s not playing up to.”

This perspective suggests that Reese’s win may be more about her off-court persona—marked by confidence, controversy, and a strong social media presence—than her on-court production. Some fans even likened the situation to treating Reese like a “Make-A-Wish kid,” implying that her recognition feels more like a publicity stunt than a genuine honor. “BET set her up to get absolutely crushed with this decision,” another observer noted, highlighting the intense scrutiny Reese now faces as a result.

Fan Toxicity and Racial Undertones in the Debate

The controversy surrounding Reese’s award has also exposed deeper tensions within the sports community, including issues of fan toxicity and racial undertones. Some critics of the BET decision faced backlash themselves, with accusations of overstepping boundaries. “Stay out of Black folks’ business,” one commenter told a non-Black analyst discussing the award, prompting a heated response about the right to critique athletes regardless of race. “We’re allowed to talk about any athlete; it doesn’t matter what color they are,” the analyst countered, emphasizing that commentary should focus on performance, not identity.

This exchange reflects a broader divide in how Reese’s win is perceived. While some see the criticism as purely basketball-related, others interpret it through a lens of racial or cultural bias, accusing detractors of unfairly targeting Reese. The debate has also drawn comparisons to the toxic elements of fanbases, with some noting that radical supporters of both Reese and other stars like Caitlin Clark can turn discussions into personal attacks. “If you don’t align with their politics, they hate you, period,” one observer lamented, pointing to the polarized nature of modern sports fandom.

Does BET Watch Basketball? Credibility in Question

A recurring theme in the backlash is the question of whether BET even follows the WNBA or basketball in general. “Nobody takes these awards seriously anymore after this,” one fan declared, while another quipped, “People wonder why nobody watches the BET Awards.” The sentiment that BET may not prioritize athletic achievement in its selections is shared by many, including Black fans who expressed indifference to the event. “I’ve seen quite a few Black folks say they don’t care about this crap anyway,” a commentator noted.

The perception that BET’s decision-making lacks grounding in sports reality has damaged its credibility among basketball enthusiasts. “What are we doing? Why not A’ja Wilson?” one fan asked, echoing a widespread frustration. The award’s relevance is further questioned by comparisons to the male category, where Jalen Hurts won after leading his team to a Super Bowl—a far more tangible achievement than Reese’s current resume offers.

Implications for Women’s Sports Recognition

The controversy over Angel Reese’s BET Sportswoman of the Year award raises important questions about how achievement is recognized in women’s sports. At a time when the WNBA is gaining unprecedented attention, thanks to stars like A’ja Wilson and rookies like Caitlin Clark, decisions like this risk undermining the league’s push for legitimacy and respect. If awards are perceived as driven by agendas rather than merit, they diminish the value of true excellence and distract from the hard-fought progress of women athletes.

Moreover, the spotlight on Reese—whether deserved or not—places additional pressure on her to perform at a level she may not yet be ready for. “This isn’t fair to Angel,” one critic argued. “She shouldn’t even be in this conversation yet.” The WNBA and its partners must navigate these narratives carefully to ensure that recognition celebrates genuine impact rather than fueling unnecessary controversy.

Fan Reactions: Humor and Frustration Collide

Amid the outrage, fans have also injected humor into the debate, with quips like “I missed 20 layups just reading this post” and suggestions that Reese won a “Make-A-Wish Award.” These lighthearted jabs underscore a deeper frustration with the perceived absurdity of the decision. “BET catching strays left and right,” one commenter laughed, while another called the situation “the biggest joke I’ve seen in years.” The blend of humor and anger reflects a fanbase desperate for accountability and transparency in how awards are determined.

Conclusion: A Call for Merit-Based Recognition

Angel Reese’s win as BET Sportswoman of the Year has sparked a heated debate about merit, agenda, and recognition in women’s sports. While Reese’s potential is undeniable, her selection over established stars like A’ja Wilson has left many questioning BET’s criteria and commitment to basketball. The backlash, tinged with accusations of media bias and fan toxicity, highlights the challenges of navigating fame and achievement in the modern sports landscape.

As the WNBA continues to grow, decisions like this must prioritize on-court excellence to maintain credibility and honor the athletes who drive the league forward. A’ja Wilson, Napheesa Collier, and countless others deserve recognition for their contributions, and fans will continue to demand answers until that happens. What do you think about Angel Reese’s win? Was it deserved, or was A’ja Wilson robbed? Join the conversation and share your thoughts—because in sports, every voice matters.

.play video: