“Nobody’s Watching”… Olympics IMPLODE as America REJECTS “Ungrateful” Athletes
.
“America Turns on ‘Ungrateful’ Olympians and NFL Wokeness: Team USA’s Divisive Politics Mar the Games 🇺🇸
As the 2026 Winter Olympics took off with excitement in Milan Cortina, it quickly became evident that political tension was simmering just beneath the surface of the Games. The world’s largest sporting event, a celebration of athleticism and national pride, has increasingly been tainted by political commentary from American athletes. In what was supposed to be a time of unity, a number of Team USA athletes chose to air their grievances, using the global platform to express their dissatisfaction with their own country. The result? A public outcry from the American people, who questioned the athletes’ loyalty and patriotism, and a broader conversation about the increasing intersection of politics and sports.
Team USA’s controversial athletes, including Amber Glenn and others, have been vocal about issues like the treatment of the queer community and their general discontent with American policies. Meanwhile, the NFL, already a target of “woke” culture, found itself embroiled in controversy once again during its Super Bowl halftime show. The NFL’s decision to feature Bad Bunny, a reggaeton artist known for his political statements, further fueled the growing divide between sports and politics.
In both the Olympics and the NFL, athletes and entertainers are increasingly using their platforms to push political agendas, often at the expense of the unity and pride these events are supposed to represent. The divide between the “woke” athletes and the American public is more evident than ever, and the fallout from this political posturing has been nothing short of dramatic.
Athletes Spewing Divisiveness: Team USA’s Political Statements
As the Olympics kicked off, one of the most notable controversies was the outspoken criticism by U.S. athletes like Amber Glenn. In a candid moment, Glenn spoke about the hardships faced by the queer community in America, suggesting that the country had not done enough to protect its citizens. “It brings up mixed emotions to represent the US right now,” Glenn admitted during a press conference. “There’s obviously a lot going on that I’m not the biggest fan of, and I think a lot of people aren’t.”
While Glenn’s comments seemed to reflect a personal struggle with her identity and the state of the nation, they also reflected a broader sentiment in which American athletes have increasingly used global events like the Olympics to speak out against their home country. Glenn’s remarks about the difficulties of representing the U.S., a country she claimed was struggling with human rights issues, particularly concerning the queer community, quickly gained attention. Yet, for many Americans, her criticisms rang hollow—especially considering the freedom and opportunities she has enjoyed as an athlete in the United States.
Moreover, athletes like Glenn have been accused of amplifying victimhood narratives that are perceived as detached from the realities of life in America. As one commentator pointed out, “As a gay man living in America, it’s never been a better time. We have equal rights, the border is secure, crime is coming down, and the economy is going up.” These statements reflect the frustrations of many Americans who feel that the athletes’ complaints about their country are misplaced and disproportionate.
The NFL’s “Woke” Agenda: Bad Bunny and the Super Bowl Controversy
While the Olympics were certainly not free from controversy, the NFL managed to stir the pot with its halftime show, which featured Bad Bunny—a reggaeton artist from Puerto Rico. While Bad Bunny is one of the most popular artists in the world, his inclusion in the Super Bowl halftime show sparked significant backlash. Many criticized the NFL for choosing an artist whose music and public persona have been heavily politicized, further fueling the growing divide between sports and politics.
The Super Bowl halftime show, which should have been a lighthearted and entertaining moment, became a platform for political commentary. Some critics argued that the choice of Bad Bunny was a deliberate attempt to cater to a “woke” agenda, further alienating large segments of the American public. The controversy surrounding the halftime show highlighted a broader trend in the entertainment industry, where political messaging is increasingly incorporated into performances, alienating viewers who want to enjoy the event without being subjected to divisive political views.
The NFL’s decision to feature Bad Bunny was seen by many as yet another example of the organization’s increasing embrace of “woke” culture, a trend that has alienated a significant portion of its fan base. For many Americans, the Super Bowl should be an event that unites people through their love of sports, not a platform for political defiance.
.
.
