Candace Owens Reveals a Shocking Truth Behind the Charlie Kirk Case | FBI Responds?
🕵️♀️ Candace Owens’ Unveiling: The “Unsettling Truth” Behind the Charlie Kirk Case
Candace Owens has publicly addressed what she calls a network of hidden influences, federal inconsistencies, and financial motivations surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk. In a series of statements, she laid out a narrative suggesting Kirk’s death was not the straightforward event portrayed by mainstream media, arguing the focus should shift from the man to the powerful “network” he was challenging.
🔗 The “Handlers” and the Paradigm Shift
Owens first detailed a strange sequence of events and encounters that began around April 2018, shortly before Kanye West’s now-infamous tweet praising her thinking.
Assigned Handlers: Owens reflected on Kirk’s death, stating she now “very much believe[s]” both she and Kirk were assigned “handlers” since 2018. She suggested these handlers worked to “intentionally… pull me and Charlie apart.”
A “Cosmic” Shift: She shared private messages with Kirk regarding a series of deleted tweets from Mike Cernovich, who spoke of an independent “shift in energy” or a “paradigm… shifting” around the time of the Kanye West connection. Kirk’s response—”Yep, we felt it, too. Remember I told you uh the dreams got darker”—suggested they both felt a profound change or unease.
The Network: Key figures like David Horowitz (father/stepfather to Andre Harowitz, reportedly involved in a bid to buy TikTok for “psychological warfare”), Eric Weinstein, and music industry giant Rick Rubin all reportedly appeared in their orbit, attempting to “facilitate” meetings and offer help in a way Owens now finds suspicious.
🤐 The Rush to Control the Narrative
Owens pointed to several public and private actions that, to her, indicated a deliberate attempt to “silence” the investigation and “lionize” Kirk’s legacy immediately after his death.
The Pro-Israel Silence: She made the striking claim that there is a notable “lack of demand” for a continued investigation among individuals with a large pro-Israel platform. She challenged listeners to “Find me just one person with a platform who’s pro Israel and says, ‘I want this investigation into his death to continue.’ It’s a bit weird, right?”
The Trump Reaction: Owens was “struck by Trump and the lack of demand… on the narrative,” noting that his public statement focused primarily on the corrupt investigation into Turning Point USA by “deranged Jack Smith” rather than a clear call for an investigation into Kirk’s murder. She argued this was a “bit weird” for someone who presented himself as anti-federal establishment.
The Holiday and Lionization: She expressed strong suspicion about President Trump establishing Kirk’s birthday, October 14th, as a “national day of remembrance.” Owens likened this to the reaction after the death of Martin Luther King Jr., saying, “It’s never good when the feds are lining up to give you a holiday,” arguing the best way to honor Kirk is to “Figure out who killed him first.”
💸 The Financial and Structural Inconsistencies
A major focus of Owens’s concern was the financial and structural changes around Turning Point USA (TPUSA) immediately following Kirk’s death, which she tied back to the initial advice of “follow the money.”
TPUSA Leadership and Finances: She revealed that a week before his death, Kirk had expressed concerns about the finances at Turning Point USA and wanted to create an entire department to address them.
The Wikipedia Update: Less than 36 hours after Kirk’s death, the TPUSA Wikipedia entry was updated to list Pastor Rob McCoy—a figure she notes benefits financially from TPUSA—as a co-founder of the TPUSA Faith division, a claim Owens labels a lie that immediately helped “establish the legacy” of a particular direction for the organization.
The Pastor’s Role: Owens disputed the claim that McCoy was the “founder” or “inspiration” behind TPUSA Faith, noting he was merely an advisor who “gets paid” by the organization for upcoming summits.
Owens concluded that the entire sequence of events, from the sudden appearance of influential “handlers” to the rapid-fire moves to define Kirk’s legacy and financial structure post-mortem, suggests a sophisticated operation that powerful people do not want exposed.
What specific inconsistencies, such as the Wikipedia update or the lack of investigation demand, do you find the most compelling in Owens’s theory?
